gravamen claim (South Carolina) · Go Syfert
← South Carolina issues

gravamen claim in South Carolina

10 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Future Group, II v. Nationsbankgreen
sc · 1996 · cited in 6 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2018
2 sentences

2018As to whether the trial court erred in dismissing its aiding and abetting cause of action: Vortex Sports & Entm't, Inc. v. Ware, 378 S.C. 197, 204 , 662 S.E.2d 444, 448 (2008) ("The elements for a cause of action of aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty are: (1) a breach of a fiduciary duty owed to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant's knowing participation in the breach; and (3) damages."); Future Group, II v. Nationsbank, 324 S.C. 89, 99 , 478 S.E.2d 45, 50 (1996) ("The gravamen of the claim is the defendant's knowing participation in the fiduciary's breach."). 4.

2018As to whether the trial court erred in dismissing its aiding and abetting cause of action: Vortex Sports & Entm't, Inc. v. Ware, 378 S.C. 197, 204 , 662 S.E.2d 444, 448 (2008) ("The elements for a cause of action of aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty are: (1) a breach of a fiduciary duty owed to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant's knowing participation in the breach; and (3) damages."); Future Group, II v. Nationsbank, 324 S.C. 89, 99 , 478 S.E.2d 45, 50 (1996) ("The gravamen of the claim is the defendant's knowing participation in the fiduciary's breach."). 4.

36
Gordon v. Busbeegreen
scctapp · 2012 · cited in 2 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2012–2015
2 sentences

2012"The gravamen of the claim is the defendant's knowing participation in the fiduciary's breach." Id.; see Gordon v. Busbee, 397 S.C. 119, 133-34 , 723 S.E.2d 822, 830 (Ct. App. 2012) (affirming the grant of directed verdict in favor of an attorney on aiding and abetting breach of personal representative's fiduciary duty and finding that even if the attorney should have conducted additional investigation into the assets of the estate, that does not constitute evidence of actual knowledge of improper activity on the personal representative's part).

2012"The gravamen of the claim is the defendant's knowing participation in the fiduciary's breach." Id.; see Gordon v. Busbee, 397 S.C. 119, 133-34 , 723 S.E.2d 822, 830 (Ct. App. 2012) (affirming the grant of directed verdict in favor of an attorney on aiding and abetting breach of personal representative's fiduciary duty and finding that even if the attorney should have conducted additional investigation into the assets of the estate, that does not constitute evidence of actual knowledge of improper activity on the personal representative's part).

22
Mullis v. Trident Emergency Physiciansgreen
scctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018As to whether the trial court erred in dismissing Church's conversion cause of action: Mullis v. Trident Emergency Physicians, 351 S.C. 503, 506-07 , 570 S.E.2d 549, 550 (Ct. App. 2002) ('"Conversion' is defined as the unauthorized assumption and exercise of the rights of ownership over goods or personal chattels belonging to another, to the alteration of their condition or to the exclusion of the rights of the owner."); id. at 507 , 570 S.E.2d at 551 ("Money . . . may be the subject of conversion if 'it is capable of being identified and there may be conversion of determinate sums even though

2018As to whether the trial court erred in dismissing Church's conversion cause of action: Mullis v. Trident Emergency Physicians, 351 S.C. 503, 506-07 , 570 S.E.2d 549, 550 (Ct. App. 2002) ('"Conversion' is defined as the unauthorized assumption and exercise of the rights of ownership over goods or personal chattels belonging to another, to the alteration of their condition or to the exclusion of the rights of the owner."); id. at 507 , 570 S.E.2d at 551 ("Money . . . may be the subject of conversion if 'it is capable of being identified and there may be conversion of determinate sums even though

11
Vortex Sports & Entertainment, Inc. v. Waregreen
scctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018As to whether the trial court erred in dismissing its aiding and abetting cause of action: Vortex Sports & Entm't, Inc. v. Ware, 378 S.C. 197, 204 , 662 S.E.2d 444, 448 (2008) ("The elements for a cause of action of aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty are: (1) a breach of a fiduciary duty owed to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant's knowing participation in the breach; and (3) damages."); Future Group, II v. Nationsbank, 324 S.C. 89, 99 , 478 S.E.2d 45, 50 (1996) ("The gravamen of the claim is the defendant's knowing participation in the fiduciary's breach."). 4.

2018As to whether the trial court erred in dismissing its aiding and abetting cause of action: Vortex Sports & Entm't, Inc. v. Ware, 378 S.C. 197, 204 , 662 S.E.2d 444, 448 (2008) ("The elements for a cause of action of aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty are: (1) a breach of a fiduciary duty owed to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant's knowing participation in the breach; and (3) damages."); Future Group, II v. Nationsbank, 324 S.C. 89, 99 , 478 S.E.2d 45, 50 (1996) ("The gravamen of the claim is the defendant's knowing participation in the fiduciary's breach."). 4.

11
University of Southern California v. Morangreen
scctapp · 2005 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Thomas and Daniel, as trustees, owed the beneficiaries of the trusts a fiduciary duty.1 See Univ. of S. Cal. v. Moran, 365 S.C. 270, 281 , 617 S.E.2d 135, 141 (Ct. App. 2005) (stating a trustee "has a fiduciary obligation to administer the trust in the best interests of the trust beneficiaries").

2015Thomas and Daniel, as trustees, owed the beneficiaries of the trusts a fiduciary duty.1 See Univ. of S. Cal. v. Moran, 365 S.C. 270, 281 , 617 S.E.2d 135, 141 (Ct. App. 2005) (stating a trustee "has a fiduciary obligation to administer the trust in the best interests of the trust beneficiaries").

11
Snell v. Columbia Gun Exchange, Inc.green
sc · 1981 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011The claimant must exercise reasonable diligence in discerning compensability. *314 See Snell v. Columbia Gun Exch., Inc., 276 S.C. 301, 303 , 278 S.E.2d 333, 334 (1981) ("The exercise of reasonable diligence means simply that an injured party must act with some promptness where the facts and circumstances of an injury would put a person of common knowledge and experience on notice that some right of his has been invaded or that some claim against another party might exist.

2011The claimant must exercise reasonable diligence in discerning compensability. *314 See Snell v. Columbia Gun Exch., Inc., 276 S.C. 301, 303 , 278 S.E.2d 333, 334 (1981) ("The exercise of reasonable diligence means simply that an injured party must act with some promptness where the facts and circumstances of an injury would put a person of common knowledge and experience on notice that some right of his has been invaded or that some claim against another party might exist.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Holmes v. Young green
coloctapp · 1994
1 sentence

1996Id. at 309 ; see also Samuel M.

11996–1996

Where else courts name it

CA 136 (1915–2026) TX 47 (2010–2026) NY 33 (1904–2024) ID 27 (2001–2026) CT 20 (1981–2024) OR 18 (1905–2025) TN 15 (1998–2026) MI 12 (1976–2024) MD 12 (1969–2022) SC 10 (1996–2018) AL 9 (1885–2017) MT 8 (1993–2026) IL 7 (2005–2021) MA 7 (1977–2019) PA 7 (1981–2024) NC 6 (1923–2023) KS 6 (1979–2022) WA 6 (1990–2025) IA 5 (1986–2024) CO 5 (1994–2024) GA 5 (1932–2015) UT 5 (1997–2019) MO 4 (2012–2024) NM 4 (1997–2021) FL 4 (1992–2024) AZ 4 (1971–2018) DE 3 (1971–2025) NJ 3 (1995–2024) OK 2 (2015–2015) VA 2 (2000–2004) IN 2 (2002–2009) NE 2 (2020–2025) OH 2 (1971–1990) AK 2 (1983–1998) MS 2 (2005–2006) RI 2 (2006–2014) WV 2 (2020–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check