Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachsgreen2 sentences2024Id.; accord OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs, 577 U.S. 27, 35 (2015) (“Nelson instead teaches that an action is ‘based upon’ the ‘particular conduct’ that constitutes the ‘gravamen’ of the suit.”). 2024Id.; accord OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs, 577 U.S. 27, 35 (2015) (“Nelson instead teaches that an action is ‘based upon’ the ‘particular conduct’ that constitutes the ‘gravamen’ of the suit.”). | 2 | 2 |
MH by and Through Callahan v. Stategreen1 sentence1997See Callahan v. State, 385 N.W.2d 533, 537-38 (Iowa 1986); Smith, 324 N.W.2d at 301-02 . | 1 | 1 |
Dickerson v. Younggreen1 sentence1989Russell testified he was “flabbergasted” and that he did not tell his wife of the threats because he “simply didn’t want her to have to carry that burden or the threat of losing a husband and the father of her kids.” As in Dickerson v. Young, 332 N.W.2d 93, 98 (Iowa 1983), the issue of emotional distress in this case is not the gravamen of the claim brought; it is merely an item of damage. | 1 | 1 |
Toney v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.green1 sentence1986While it is alleged that this resulted in a breach of plaintiff’s employment contract, proof of that allegation, we believe, is not essential to establish a claim for tortious interference under our decision in Toney v. Casey’s General Stores, Inc., 372 N.W.2d 220, 222 (Iowa 1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence1997See Callahan v. State, 385 N.W.2d 533, 537-38 (Iowa 1986); Smith, 324 N.W.2d at 301-02 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.