Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hudson v. Stategreen2 sentences2015This unprecedented totality-of-the-exceptions approach adds zeros to create one, ignoring that the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement “have been jealously and carefully drawn.” Hudson v. State, 588 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Tex. Crim. 2014This unprecedented totality-of-the-exceptions approach adds zeros to create one, ignoring that the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement “have been jealously and carefully drawn.” Hudson v. State, 588 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Tex.Crim.App.1979) (quoting Jones v. United States, 357 U.S. 493, 499 , 78 S.Ct. 1253 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1514 (1958)). | 2 | 2 |
Yeager v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Id. at 106. 2005See Yeager , 104 S.W.3d at 106-07 . | 2 | 2 |
Winter v. Stategreen2 sentences2003This court has previously distinguished Welsh from cases, such as this one, where the offense is “jailable.” Winter v. State, 902 S.W.2d 571, 573 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, no pet.). 2003This court has previously distinguished Welsh from cases, such as this one, where the offense is “jailable.” Winter v. State , 902 S.W.2d 571, 573 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Terry v. Ohiogreen1 sentence2015See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968); McGee v. State, 105 S.W.3d 609, 615 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
McGee v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968); McGee v. State, 105 S.W.3d 609, 615 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Stategreen1 sentence1987See, e.g., Green v. State, 490 S.W.2d 826 (Tex.Crim.App.1973); Watson v. State, 466 S.W.2d 783 (Tex.Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Minor v. Stategreen2 sentences1987Id. at 470 . 1987Id. at 470. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. United States
green
2 sentences2014This unprecedented totality-of-the-exceptions approach adds zeros to create one, ignoring that the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement “have been jealously and carefully drawn.” Hudson v. State, 588 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Tex.Crim.App.1979) (quoting Jones v. United States, 357 U.S. 493, 499 , 78 S.Ct. 1253 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1514 (1958)). 2014This unprecedented totality-of-the-exceptions approach adds zeros to create one, ignoring that the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement “have been jealously and carefully drawn.” Hudson v. State, 588 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Tex.Crim.App.1979) (quoting Jones v. United States, 357 U.S. 493, 499 , 78 S.Ct. 1253 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1514 (1958)). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Welsh v. Wisconsin
green
1 sentence2003The Court held that there were no exigent circumstances to justify entry because the defendant was only suspected of committing a minor offense, and the hot pursuit doctrine did not apply because there was no continuous pursuit of the defendant from the site of the accident. 466 U.S. at 753-54 , 104 S.Ct. at 2099. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Clark
green
2 sentences1987In particular, the State relies on an Illinois case in which an arrest outside the jurisdiction was upheld, even though the arresting officers never sighted the suspects within the jurisdiction, because the pursuit “was continuous, uninterrupted and without unreasonable delay.” People v. Clark, 46 Ill.App.3d 240 , 4 Ill.Dec. 785 , 360 N.E.2d 1160 (1977). 1987In particular, the State relies on an Illinois case in which an arrest outside the jurisdiction was upheld, even though the arresting officers never sighted the suspects within the jurisdiction, because the pursuit “was continuous, uninterrupted and without unreasonable delay.” People v. Clark, 46 Ill.App.3d 240 , 4 Ill.Dec. 785 , 360 N.E.2d 1160 (1977). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Watson v. State
green
1 sentence1987See, e.g., Green v. State, 490 S.W.2d 826 (Tex.Crim.App.1973); Watson v. State, 466 S.W.2d 783 (Tex.Crim. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Johnson v. State
green
2 sentences1973See generally, Chambers v. Maroney, supra; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 466 S.W.2d 735 . 1973See generally, Chambers v. Maroney, supra; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 466 S.W.2d 735 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.