Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences2013“As the party making the Batson challenge, [Guild] . . . had the burden to show that the explanation given was merely a pretext for discrimination.” Johnson v. State, 68 S.W.3d 644, 649 (Tex. Crim. 2010See Johnson , 68 S.W.3d at 649 (State gave several race-neutral reasons for strike, including records showing that person with same name and birthday was arrested for driving while license was suspended, and defendant complained that State should have been required to inquire further and ask panelist whether had been arrested; court held that, "[a]s the party making the Batson challenge, appellant had the burden to show that the explanation given was merely a pretext for discrimination. | 5 | 6 |
Simpson v. Stategreen1 sentence2006See id. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Thomas Campione, Marion Collins and John Patricelligreen2 sentences2001But this broad understanding of race carries with it a burden on the party making the Batson claim, to establish the ethnicity of the person in question and show he is a member of a cognizable racial group. [7] See United States v. Campione, *858 942 F.2d 429, 433 (7th Cir.1991)("spelling of person's surname is insufficient—standing alone—to show that he or she belongs to a particular ethnic group"). 2001But this broad understanding of race carries with it a burden on the party making the Batson claim, to establish the ethnicity of the person in question and show he is a member of a cognizable racial group. 7 See United States v. Campione, 942 F.2d 429, 433 (7th Cir.1991)(“spelling of person’s surname is insufficient — standing alone — to show that he or she belongs to a particular ethnic group”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2003First, the party making the Batson claim must show a prima facie case of racial discrimination. 1 A prima facie case of discrimination may be made by showing that the totality of the relevant facts gives rise to an inference of discriminatory purpose. 2 Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. at 93-94 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 . 2003First, the party making the Batson claim must show a prima facie case of racial discrimination. 1 A prima facie case of discrimination may be made by showing that the totality of the relevant facts gives rise to an inference of discriminatory purpose. 2 Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. at 93-94 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 . | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Ford v. State
green
1 sentence2021Ford v. State, 1 S.W.3d 691 , 693–94 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.