Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Antiquities Committee v. Dallas County Community College Districtgreen2 sentences1994See Texas Antiquities Comm. v. Dallas County Community College Dist., 554 S.W.2d 924, 927-28 (Tex.1977) (failure to develop standards for determining “buildings ... and locations of historical ... interest” rendered Antiquities Code provision unconstitutionally vague). 1994See Texas Antiquities Comm. v. Dallas County Community College Dist. , 554 S.W.2d 924, 927-28 (Tex. 1977) (failure to develop standards for determining "buildings . . . and locations of historical . . . interest" rendered Antiquities Code provision unconstitutionally vague). | 2 | 2 |
Arrick v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See Arrick v. State, 107 S.W.3d 710, 719 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003, pet. ref’d). 6 motion to suppress. | 1 | 1 |
Boyde v. Stategreen1 sentence1997See Boyde v. State, 513 S.W.2d 588 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Mowbray v. State, 788 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1101 , 111 S.Ct. 999 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1082 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
Holland v. Stategreen1 sentence1992In a related point of error, appellant claims that “Article 37.071, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, is unconstitutional because there are no standards for the Court of Criminal Appeals to use in determining the sufficiency of the evidence under the special issues.” Appellant offers no persuasive rationale for this contention other than the mere assertion that “in Holland v. State, 761 S.W.2d 307, 328 (Tex.Cr.App.1988), the Court acknowledged its standard of review on the second special issue is unbridled.” We feel appellant has misconstrued our decision in Holland , in which we merely set fo | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rose v. State
yellow
2 sentences1989Appellant's argument is without merit in light of Rose, supra, and Jefferson v. State, 751 S.W.2d 502 (Tex.Cr.App.1988), wherein we held that an unconstitutional statute is void from inception and cannot provide a basis for any right or relief. 1989Appellant’s argument is without merit in light of Rose, supra, and Jefferson v. State, 751 S.W.2d 502 (Tex.Cr.App.1988), wherein we held that an unconstitutional statute is void from inception and cannot provide a basis for any right or relief. | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Jefferson v. State
green
2 sentences1989Appellant's argument is without merit in light of Rose, supra, and Jefferson v. State, 751 S.W.2d 502 (Tex.Cr.App.1988), wherein we held that an unconstitutional statute is void from inception and cannot provide a basis for any right or relief. 1989Appellant’s argument is without merit in light of Rose, supra, and Jefferson v. State, 751 S.W.2d 502 (Tex.Cr.App.1988), wherein we held that an unconstitutional statute is void from inception and cannot provide a basis for any right or relief. | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Mowbray v. State
green
1 sentence1997See Boyde v. State, 513 S.W.2d 588 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Mowbray v. State, 788 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1101 , 111 S.Ct. 999 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1082 (1991). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Smith v. Lockhart
green
1 sentence1997See Boyde v. State, 513 S.W.2d 588 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Mowbray v. State, 788 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1101 , 111 S.Ct. 999 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1082 (1991). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Mowbray v. Texas
green
2 sentences1997See Boyde v. State, 513 S.W.2d 588 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Mowbray v. State, 788 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1101 , 111 S.Ct. 999 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1082 (1991). 1997See Boyde v. State, 513 S.W.2d 588 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Mowbray v. State, 788 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1101 , 111 S.Ct. 999 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1082 (1991). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Elbaor v. Smith
green
2 sentences1995MARY CARTER CONTENTIONS In a related point of error, Maryland contends that this lawsuit, verdict, and judgment are the result of an illegal Mary Carter agreement, citing the Texas Supreme Court's decision in Elbaor v. Smith, 845 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.1992). 1995Maey Caeter Contentions In a related point of error, Maryland contends that this lawsuit, verdict, and judgment are the result of an illegal Mary Carter agreement, citing the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Elbaor v. Smith, 845 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.1992). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates v. Public Utility Commission of Texas
green
2 sentences1995As authority for its position, the City relies primarily on the supreme court’s decision in Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates v. Public Utility Commission, 798 S.W.2d 560 (Tex.1990), which held that res judicata and collateral estoppel prohibit a utility’s relitigating historical investment facts such as the prudence of construction expenditures. 1995As authority for its position, the City relies primarily on the supreme court's decision in Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates v. Public Utility Commission, 798 S.W.2d 560 (Tex. 1990), which held that res judicata and collateral estoppel prohibit a utility's relitigating historical investment facts such as the prudence of construction expenditures. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Butler v. State
green
1 sentence1992This point is clearly governed by our recent opinion of Butler v. State, 830 S.W.2d 125 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.