10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rogers v. Tennesseegreen2 sentences2010See Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 451, 457 , 121 S.Ct. 1693 , 149 L.Ed.2d 697 (2001) ("Deprivation of the right to fair warning, we continued, can result both from vague statutory language and from an unforeseeable and retroactive judicial expansion of statutory language that appears narrow and precise on its face.”). 2010See Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 451, 457 , 121 S.Ct. 1693 , 149 L.Ed.2d 697 (2001) ("Deprivation of the right to fair warning, we continued, can result both from vague statutory language and from an unforeseeable and retroactive judicial expansion of statutory language that appears narrow and precise on its face.”). | 4 | 4 |
Busby v. Stategreen1 sentence2007Busby v. State, 990 S.W.2d 263, 267 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). . | 1 | 1 |
Proctor v. Stategreen1 sentence2006See Proctor v. State , 967 S.W.2d 840, 845 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Harrissgreen2 sentences1979See United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617 , 74 S.Ct. 808, 811 , 98 L.Ed. 989 (1954); Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451, 453 , 59 S.Ct. 618, 619 , 83 L.Ed. 888 (1939). 1979See United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617 , 74 S.Ct. 808, 811 , 98 L.Ed. 989 (1954); Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451, 453 , 59 S.Ct. 618, 619 , 83 L.Ed. 888 (1939). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Tamika Wade
green
2 sentences2015Due process concerns do require that the application of judicial decisions to a pending defendant’s case complies with the concepts of notice, foreseeability, and in particular the right to fair warning, U.S. v. Wade, 435 F.3d 829 (8th Cir. 2006). 4. 2015Due process concerns do require that the application of judicial decisions to a pending defendant’s case complies with the concepts of notice, foreseeability, and in particular the right to fair warning, U.S. v. Wade, 435 F.3d 829 (8th Cir. 2006). 4. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Moore v. State
green
2 sentences2007Retroactive application of a contrary and more expansive interpretation of the conspiracy statute would violate the defendants’ right to fair warning of what constitutes criminal behavior. 5 With these comments, I join the Court’s opinion. . 545 S.W.2d 140 (Tex.Crim.App.1976) . 547 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.Crim.App.1977). . 2007Filed: June 27, 2007 Publish 1. 545 S.W.2d 140 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Baker v. State
green
1 sentence2007Retroactive application of a contrary and more expansive interpretation of the conspiracy statute would violate the defendants’ right to fair warning of what constitutes criminal behavior. 5 With these comments, I join the Court’s opinion. . 545 S.W.2d 140 (Tex.Crim.App.1976) . 547 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.Crim.App.1977). . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Lanzetta v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences1979See United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617 , 74 S.Ct. 808, 811 , 98 L.Ed. 989 (1954); Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451, 453 , 59 S.Ct. 618, 619 , 83 L.Ed. 888 (1939). 1979See United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617 , 74 S.Ct. 808, 811 , 98 L.Ed. 989 (1954); Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451, 453 , 59 S.Ct. 618, 619 , 83 L.Ed. 888 (1939). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.