Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1881–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bargreen1 sentence2024Compounding the problem, judges treat the tiers of scrutiny as “guidelines informing [their] approach to the case at hand, not tests to be mechanically applied.” Williams-Yulee v. Fla. Bar, 575 U.S. 433, 457 (2015) (Breyer, J., concurring). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt
green
1 sentence2024As the Court applies whatever standard it likes to any given case, nothing but empty words separates our constitutional decisions from judicial fiat.” Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 136 S. Ct. 2292 , 2326–27 (2016) (Thomas, J., dissenting) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Schuessler v. State
green
1 sentence1993Id. at 332 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Batten v. State
green
2 sentences1984Indeed, under the rationale of Batten it is not even “reversible error,” id., at 790 . 1984Indeed, under the rationale of Batten it is not even "reversible error," id., at 790 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Schaffer v. State
green
1 sentence1983The sua sponte termination of a criminal trial after jeopardy has “attached” can only be proper when required by “manifest necessity” or the “ends of public justice.” Illinois v. Somerville, 410 U.S. 458, 462-63 , 93 S.Ct. 1066, 1069-70 , 35 L.Ed.2d 425 (1973); Schaffer v. State, 649 S.W.2d 637 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Barton v. Farmers' State Bank
green
2 sentences1983Cf. Barton v. Farmers’ State Bank, 276 S.W. 177 (Texas Com.App. 1925). 1983Cf. Barton v. Farmers' State Bank, 276 S.W. 177 (Texas Com.App. 1925). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Illinois v. Somerville
green
2 sentences1983The sua sponte termination of a criminal trial after jeopardy has “attached” can only be proper when required by “manifest necessity” or the “ends of public justice.” Illinois v. Somerville, 410 U.S. 458, 462-63 , 93 S.Ct. 1066, 1069-70 , 35 L.Ed.2d 425 (1973); Schaffer v. State, 649 S.W.2d 637 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). 1983The sua sponte termination of a criminal trial after jeopardy has “attached” can only be proper when required by “manifest necessity” or the “ends of public justice.” Illinois v. Somerville, 410 U.S. 458, 462-63 , 93 S.Ct. 1066, 1069-70 , 35 L.Ed.2d 425 (1973); Schaffer v. State, 649 S.W.2d 637 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Barrera v. Duval County Ranch Co.
green
1 sentence1977Hill v. Baylor, 23 Tex. 261 (1859), Bohanan v. Hans, 26 Tex. 445 (1863), Barrera v. Duval County Ranch Company, 135 S.W.2d 518 (Tex.Civ.App. 1939, writ ref’d.), 1 McCormick and Ray, Texas Law of Evidence § 27 (2nd Ed. 1956). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Hill v. Baylor
green
1 sentence1977Hill v. Baylor, 23 Tex. 261 (1859), Bohanan v. Hans, 26 Tex. 445 (1863), Barrera v. Duval County Ranch Company, 135 S.W.2d 518 (Tex.Civ.App. 1939, writ ref’d.), 1 McCormick and Ray, Texas Law of Evidence § 27 (2nd Ed. 1956). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Bohanan v. Hans
green
1 sentence1977Hill v. Baylor, 23 Tex. 261 (1859), Bohanan v. Hans, 26 Tex. 445 (1863), Barrera v. Duval County Ranch Company, 135 S.W.2d 518 (Tex.Civ.App. 1939, writ ref’d.), 1 McCormick and Ray, Texas Law of Evidence § 27 (2nd Ed. 1956). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Reynolds v. McMan Oil & Gas Co.
green
1 sentence1966Reynolds et al. v. McMan Oil & Gas Co. et al., Tex.App., 11 S.W.2d 778 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Means v. Porter
green
1 sentence1956Means v. Porter, Tex.Civ.App., 216 S.W.2d 269 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Tuttle v. Turner, Wilson & Co.
green
1 sentence1920Tuttle v. Turner, 28 Tex. 759 ; McLaughlin v. McManigle, 63 Tex. 553 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
McLaughlin v. McManigle
green
1 sentence1920Tuttle v. Turner, 28 Tex. 759 ; McLaughlin v. McManigle, 63 Tex. 553 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Commonwealth ex rel. Davis v. Lecky
neutral
1 sentence1881March 23, 1881. “ The habeas corpus is undoubtedly an immediate remedy for every illegal imprisonment; but no imprisonment is illegal when the process is a justification to the officer; and process, whether by writ or warrant, is legal whenever it is not defective in the frame of it, and has issued in the ordinary course of justice, from a court or magistrate having jurisdiction of the subject matter, though there have been error or irregularity in the proceedings previous to the issuing of it.” [Com. v. Lecky, 1 Watts, 66 ; Hurd on Hab. | 1 | 1881–1881 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.