Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Longgreen2 sentences2021State v. Long, 721 P.2d 483 , 492-93 (Utah 1986). 2018This last area includes such factors as whether the event was an ordinary one in the mind of the observer during the time it was observed, and whether the race of the actor was the same as the observer's." Id. (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Long , 721 P.2d 483 , 493 (Utah 1986) ). ¶16 Because Defendant challenges his convictions on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel, "we are not directly tasked with determining whether the eyewitness testimony was admissible." See State v. Craft , 2017 UT App 87 , ¶ 18, 397 P.3d 889 . | 3 | 9 |
State v. Ramirezgreen2 sentences2018This last area includes such factors as whether the event was an ordinary one in the mind of the observer during the time it was observed, and whether the race of the actor was the same as the observer's." Id. (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Long , 721 P.2d 483 , 493 (Utah 1986) ). ¶16 Because Defendant challenges his convictions on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel, "we are not directly tasked with determining whether the eyewitness testimony was admissible." See State v. Craft , 2017 UT App 87 , ¶ 18, 397 P.3d 889 . 2017Id. at 781 (alteration omitted) (quoting State v. Long, 721 P.2d 483, 493 (Utah 1986)). ¶ 18 Because Craft challenges his convictions on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel, we are ■ not directly tasked with determining whether the eyewitness testimony was admissible. | 2 | 7 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Craft
green
2 sentences2018This last area includes such factors as whether the event was an ordinary one in the mind of the observer during the time it was observed, and whether the race of the actor was the same as the observer's." Id. (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Long , 721 P.2d 483 , 493 (Utah 1986) ). ¶16 Because Defendant challenges his convictions on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel, "we are not directly tasked with determining whether the eyewitness testimony was admissible." See State v. Craft , 2017 UT App 87 , ¶ 18, 397 P.3d 889 . 2018This last area includes such factors as whether the event was an ordinary one in the mind of the observer during the time it was observed, and whether the race of the actor was the same as the observer's." Id. (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Long , 721 P.2d 483 , 493 (Utah 1986) ). ¶16 Because Defendant challenges his convictions on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel, "we are not directly tasked with determining whether the eyewitness testimony was admissible." See State v. Craft , 2017 UT App 87 , ¶ 18, 397 P.3d 889 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |