Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Virginia opinions name it 4 courts 1995–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2001In order to safeguard citizens and curb police abuse, evidence obtained in violation of these rights, “is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution for a charged criminal violation pertaining to the seized evidence.” Anderson v. Commonwealth, 20 Va. App. 361, 363 (1995). 2000“Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution for a charged criminal violation pertaining to the seized evidence.” Anderson v. Commonwealth, 20 Va. App. 361, 363 , 457 S.E.2d 396, 397 (1995), aff'd, 251 Va. 437 , 470 S.E.2d 862 (1996). | 8 | 8 |
Mapp v. Ohiogreen2 sentences1997Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 , 81 S.Ct. 1684, 1691-92 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, 1090 (1961). 1997Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 , 81 S.Ct. 1684, 1691-92 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, 1090 (1961). | 1 | 2 |
Duarte v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2000In Duarte v. Commonwealth, 12 Va.App. 1023, 1025 , 407 S.E.2d 41, 42 (1991), we stated, “[T]he rule which excludes the evidence obtained by unlawful search because in violation of the Fourth Amendment does not apply where the unlawful search was made by a private individual acting on his own initiative.” Harmon v. Commonwealth, 209 Va. 574, 577 , 166 S.E.2d 232, 234 (1969). 2000In Duarte v. Commonwealth, 12 Va.App. 1023, 1025 , 407 S.E.2d 41, 42 (1991), we stated, “[T]he rule which excludes the evidence obtained by unlawful search because in violation of the Fourth Amendment does not apply where the unlawful search was made by a private individual acting on his own initiative.” Harmon v. Commonwealth, 209 Va. 574, 577 , 166 S.E.2d 232, 234 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
Harmon v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2000In Duarte v. Commonwealth, 12 Va.App. 1023, 1025 , 407 S.E.2d 41, 42 (1991), we stated, “[T]he rule which excludes the evidence obtained by unlawful search because in violation of the Fourth Amendment does not apply where the unlawful search was made by a private individual acting on his own initiative.” Harmon v. Commonwealth, 209 Va. 574, 577 , 166 S.E.2d 232, 234 (1969). 2000In Duarte v. Commonwealth, 12 Va.App. 1023, 1025 , 407 S.E.2d 41, 42 (1991), we stated, “[T]he rule which excludes the evidence obtained by unlawful search because in violation of the Fourth Amendment does not apply where the unlawful search was made by a private individual acting on his own initiative.” Harmon v. Commonwealth, 209 Va. 574, 577 , 166 S.E.2d 232, 234 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2000“Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution for a charged criminal violation pertaining to the seized evidence.” Anderson v. Commonwealth, 20 Va. App. 361, 363 , 457 S.E.2d 396, 397 (1995), aff'd, 251 Va. 437 , 470 S.E.2d 862 (1996). 2000“Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution for a charged criminal violation pertaining to the seized evidence.” Anderson v. Commonwealth, 20 Va. App. 361, 363 , 457 S.E.2d 396, 397 (1995), aff'd, 251 Va. 437 , 470 S.E.2d 862 (1996). | 5 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.