Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Penrod v. Penrodgreen2 sentences2013Furthermore, “[a] finding of ‘cohabitation’ must be based upon evidence concerning the overall nature of the relationship, not merely a piecemeal consideration of individual factors such as its sexual or financial components.” Penrod, 29 Va. App. at 101 , 510 S.E.2d at 246 . 2013Furthermore, “[a] finding of ‘cohabitation’ must be based upon evidence concerning the overall nature of the relationship, not merely a piecemeal consideration of individual factors such as its sexual or financial components.” Penrod, 29 Va. App. at 101 , 510 S.E.2d at 246 . | 9 | 10 |
Frey v. Freygreen2 sentences2009See Schweider v. Schweider, 243 Va. 245, 248 , 415 S.E.2d 135, 137 (1992) (concluding that “cohabit” means “to live together in the same house as married persons live together, or in the manner of husband and wife”); Penrod v. Penrod, 29 Va.App. 96, 101 , 510 S.E.2d 244, 246 (1999) (finding “ ‘cohabitation’ must be based upon evidence concerning the overall nature of the relationship, not merely a piecemeal consideration of individual factors such as its sexual or financial components”); Frey v. Frey, 14 Va.App. 270, 272 , 416 S.E.2d 40, 41 (1992) (reversing the trial court’s ruling that “coha 2009See Schweider v. Schweider, 243 Va. 245, 248 , 415 S.E.2d 135, 137 (1992) (concluding that “cohabit” means “to live together in the same house as married persons live together, or in the manner of husband and wife”); Penrod v. Penrod, 29 Va.App. 96, 101 , 510 S.E.2d 244, 246 (1999) (finding “ ‘cohabitation’ must be based upon evidence concerning the overall nature of the relationship, not merely a piecemeal consideration of individual factors such as its sexual or financial components”); Frey v. Frey, 14 Va.App. 270, 272 , 416 S.E.2d 40, 41 (1992) (reversing the trial court’s ruling that “coha | 2 | 2 |
Schweider v. Schweidergreen2 sentences2009See Schweider v. Schweider, 243 Va. 245, 248 , 415 S.E.2d 135, 137 (1992) (concluding that “cohabit” means “to live together in the same house as married persons live together, or in the manner of husband and wife”); Penrod v. Penrod, 29 Va.App. 96, 101 , 510 S.E.2d 244, 246 (1999) (finding “ ‘cohabitation’ must be based upon evidence concerning the overall nature of the relationship, not merely a piecemeal consideration of individual factors such as its sexual or financial components”); Frey v. Frey, 14 Va.App. 270, 272 , 416 S.E.2d 40, 41 (1992) (reversing the trial court’s ruling that “coha 2009See Schweider v. Schweider, 243 Va. 245, 248 , 415 S.E.2d 135, 137 (1992) (concluding that “cohabit” means “to live together in the same house as married persons live together, or in the manner of husband and wife”); Penrod v. Penrod, 29 Va.App. 96, 101 , 510 S.E.2d 244, 246 (1999) (finding “ ‘cohabitation’ must be based upon evidence concerning the overall nature of the relationship, not merely a piecemeal consideration of individual factors such as its sexual or financial components”); Frey v. Frey, 14 Va.App. 270, 272 , 416 S.E.2d 40, 41 (1992) (reversing the trial court’s ruling that “coha | 1 | 1 |
Stuart M. Bergman v. Janice L. Bergmangreen2 sentences2000See Penrod, 29 Va.App. at 101 , 510 S.E.2d at 246 (a court’s findings “must be based upon evidence concerning the overall nature of the relationship, not merely a piecemeal consideration of individual factors”); Frey, 14 Va.App. at 275 , 416 S.E.2d at 43 (trial courts must not give any single factor dispositive effect); cf. Bergman, 25 Va.App. at 213, 487 S.E.2d at 267 (“cohabit” and “co-reside” are not synonymous, each having distinct elements and meanings). 2000See Penrod, 29 Va.App. at 101 , 510 S.E.2d at 246 (a court’s findings “must be based upon evidence concerning the overall nature of the relationship, not merely a piecemeal consideration of individual factors”); Frey, 14 Va.App. at 275 , 416 S.E.2d at 43 (trial courts must not give any single factor dispositive effect); cf. Bergman, 25 Va.App. at 213, 487 S.E.2d at 267 (“cohabit” and “co-reside” are not synonymous, each having distinct elements and meanings). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pellegrin v. Pellegrin
green
2 sentences2009“Furthermore, it is within the province of the trial court to determine what weight to accord each of the factors . . . .” Pellegrin, 31 Va. App. at 766 , 525 S.E.2d at 617 . 2009“Furthermore, it is within the province of the trial court to determine what weight to accord each of the factors . . . .” Pellegrin, 31 Va. App. at 766 , 525 S.E.2d at 617 . | 3 | 2002–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.