Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 California opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2024 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pack v. Kings County Human Services Agencygreen2 sentences2022(See Pack v. Kings County Human Services Agency (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 821, 826, fn. 5 (Pack) [“ ‘Although it is the appellant’s task to show error, there is a corresponding obligation on the part of the respondent to aid the appellate court in sustaining the judgment. “[I]t is as much the duty of the respondent to assist the [appellate] court upon the appeal as it is to properly present a case in the first instance, in the court below.” [Citations.]’ [Citation.]”].) 9 upon vague or general descriptions”—e.g., race and sex. 2021(See § 362.4, subds. (a)–(b).) Nor does DCFS make any attempt to explain how a juvenile court could award Jose A. sole physical custody of A.A. without “tak[ing A.A.] from the physical custody 25 of” mother for the purposes of section 361, subdivision (d).16 (See § 361, subd. (d); see also Pack v. Kings County Human Services Agency (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 821, 826, fn. 5 [“ ‘Although it is the appellant’s task to show error, there is a corresponding obligation on the part of the respondent to aid the appellate court in sustaining the judgment. “[I]t is as much the duty of the respondent to assis | 5 | 6 |
People v. Evansgreen1 sentence2024(See In re D.N. (2020) 56 Cal.App.5th 741 , 767 [“ ‘ “Although it is the appellant’s task to show error, there is a corresponding obligation on the part of the respondent to aid the appellate court in sustaining the judgment.” ’ ”]; People v. Evans (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 735, 756, fn. 12 [rejecting an argument the People failed to support adequately].) Lastly, Mosby is distinguishable from the instant case. | 1 | 1 |
Parker v. Powellgreen1 sentence2022Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 1028, 1034 ; see also Estate of Powell (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1434, 1439 [section 906 permits a respondent, without appealing, to assert a legal theory “ ‘which may result in affirmance of the judgment.’ ”]; California State Employees’ Assn. v. State Personnel Bd. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 372, 382, fn. 7 [“ ‘Although it is the appellant’s task to show error, there is a corresponding obligation on the part of the respondent to aid the appellate court in sustaining the judgment;’ ” thus, respondent may, without appealing, “assert a legal theory which may result in affirmanc | 1 | 1 |
California State Employees' Ass'n v. State Personnel Boardgreen1 sentence2022Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 1028, 1034 ; see also Estate of Powell (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1434, 1439 [section 906 permits a respondent, without appealing, to assert a legal theory “ ‘which may result in affirmance of the judgment.’ ”]; California State Employees’ Assn. v. State Personnel Bd. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 372, 382, fn. 7 [“ ‘Although it is the appellant’s task to show error, there is a corresponding obligation on the part of the respondent to aid the appellate court in sustaining the judgment;’ ” thus, respondent may, without appealing, “assert a legal theory which may result in affirmanc | 1 | 1 |
In Re Nicholas H.green1 sentence2021(See § 362.4, subds. (a)–(b).) Nor does DCFS make any attempt to explain how a juvenile court could award Jose A. sole physical custody of A.A. without “tak[ing A.A.] from the physical custody 25 of” mother for the purposes of section 361, subdivision (d).16 (See § 361, subd. (d); see also Pack v. Kings County Human Services Agency (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 821, 826, fn. 5 [“ ‘Although it is the appellant’s task to show error, there is a corresponding obligation on the part of the respondent to aid the appellate court in sustaining the judgment. “[I]t is as much the duty of the respondent to assis | 1 | 1 |
In Re John W.yellow1 sentence2021(See § 362.4, subds. (a)–(b).) Nor does DCFS make any attempt to explain how a juvenile court could award Jose A. sole physical custody of A.A. without “tak[ing A.A.] from the physical custody 25 of” mother for the purposes of section 361, subdivision (d).16 (See § 361, subd. (d); see also Pack v. Kings County Human Services Agency (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 821, 826, fn. 5 [“ ‘Although it is the appellant’s task to show error, there is a corresponding obligation on the part of the respondent to aid the appellate court in sustaining the judgment. “[I]t is as much the duty of the respondent to assis | 1 | 1 |
Henigson v. Bank of Americagreen2 sentences1986(See, e.g., Puritan Leasing Co. v. August (1976) 16 Cal.3d 451, 463 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 546 P.2d 679 ]; Henigson v. Bank of America (1948) 32 Cal.2d 240, 244 [ 195 P.2d 777 ]; Ray v. Parker (1940) 15 Cal.2d 275, 282 [ 101 P.2d 665 ]; California C.P. 1986(See, e.g., Puritan Leasing Co. v. August (1976) 16 Cal.3d 451, 463 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 546 P.2d 679 ]; Henigson v. Bank of America (1948) 32 Cal.2d 240, 244 [ 195 P.2d 777 ]; Ray v. Parker (1940) 15 Cal.2d 275, 282 [ 101 P.2d 665 ]; California C.P. | 1 | 1 |
Puritan Leasing Co. v. Augustgreen2 sentences1986(See, e.g., Puritan Leasing Co. v. August (1976) 16 Cal.3d 451, 463 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 546 P.2d 679 ]; Henigson v. Bank of America (1948) 32 Cal.2d 240, 244 [ 195 P.2d 777 ]; Ray v. Parker (1940) 15 Cal.2d 275, 282 [ 101 P.2d 665 ]; California C.P. 1986(See, e.g., Puritan Leasing Co. v. August (1976) 16 Cal.3d 451, 463 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 546 P.2d 679 ]; Henigson v. Bank of America (1948) 32 Cal.2d 240, 244 [ 195 P.2d 777 ]; Ray v. Parker (1940) 15 Cal.2d 275, 282 [ 101 P.2d 665 ]; California C.P. | 1 | 1 |
Ray v. Parkergreen2 sentences1986(See, e.g., Puritan Leasing Co. v. August (1976) 16 Cal.3d 451, 463 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 546 P.2d 679 ]; Henigson v. Bank of America (1948) 32 Cal.2d 240, 244 [ 195 P.2d 777 ]; Ray v. Parker (1940) 15 Cal.2d 275, 282 [ 101 P.2d 665 ]; California C.P. 1986(See, e.g., Puritan Leasing Co. v. August (1976) 16 Cal.3d 451, 463 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 546 P.2d 679 ]; Henigson v. Bank of America (1948) 32 Cal.2d 240, 244 [ 195 P.2d 777 ]; Ray v. Parker (1940) 15 Cal.2d 275, 282 [ 101 P.2d 665 ]; California C.P. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Khorsand v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
neutral
1 sentence2022Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 1028, 1034 ; see also Estate of Powell (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1434, 1439 [section 906 permits a respondent, without appealing, to assert a legal theory “ ‘which may result in affirmance of the judgment.’ ”]; California State Employees’ Assn. v. State Personnel Bd. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 372, 382, fn. 7 [“ ‘Although it is the appellant’s task to show error, there is a corresponding obligation on the part of the respondent to aid the appellate court in sustaining the judgment;’ ” thus, respondent may, without appealing, “assert a legal theory which may result in affirmanc | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Walker
green
1 sentence2022(See People v. Walker (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1372 , 1388–1389.) Assuming arguendo the trial court’s factual summary were accurate and that the officers reasonably suspected that Rouise was one of the two Black males who fled the car, these circumstances do not justify Rouise’s temporary detention. | 1 | 2022–2022 |