Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brecht v. Abrahamsonred2 sentences2012Such errors infect the entire trial process, Brecht v. Abrahamson, [ 507 U.S. 619, 630 , 113 S. Ct. 1710 , 123 L. Ed. 2d 353 (1993)], and necessarily render a trial fundamentally unfair, [Rose v. Clark, supra, 478 U.S. 577 ]. 2012Such errors infect the entire trial process, Brecht v. Abrahamson, [ 507 U.S. 619, 630 , 113 S. Ct. 1710 , 123 L. Ed. 2d 353 (1993)], and necessarily render a trial fundamentally unfair, [Rose v. Clark, supra, 478 U.S. 577 ]. | 1 | 3 |
Arizona v. Fulminantegreen1 sentence2017These cases 'contain a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself. [Id., at 310, 111 S.Ct. 1246 ]. | 1 | 1 |
Pressley v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co.green2 sentences2010Co. v. Hillmon, 188 U.S. 208 , 23 S.Ct. 294 , 47 L.Ed. 446 (1903); see also Pressley v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co., 271 Ill. 622 , 111 N.E. 511 (1916) (retried four times despite no substantial error). [14] A structural error is "a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself.... 2010Co. v. Hillmon, 188 U.S. 208 , 23 S.Ct. 294 , 47 L.Ed. 446 (1903); see also Pressley v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co., 271 Ill. 622 , 111 N.E. 511 (1916) (retried four times despite no substantial error). [14] A structural error is "a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself.... | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lopez
green
2 sentences2022These cases contain a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Lopez, 271 Conn. 724, 733 , 859 A.2d 898 (2004). 2022These cases contain a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Lopez, 271 Conn. 724, 733 , 859 A.2d 898 (2004). | 4 | 2010–2026 |
State v. Armadore
green
1 sentence2026These cases contain a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Alexander, 343 Conn. 495 , 511 n.13, 275 A.3d 199 (2022). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Alexande r
green
1 sentence2026These cases contain a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Alexander, 343 Conn. 495 , 511 n.13, 275 A.3d 199 (2022). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Artis
green
2 sentences2016Structural defect cases defy analysis by harmless error standards because the entire conduct of the trial, from beginning to end, is obviously affected ...." (Emphasis altered; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Artis , 314 Conn. 131 , 150, 101 A.3d 915 (2014). "[S]tructural defect cases contain a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself. ... 2016Structural defect cases defy analysis by harmless error standards because the entire conduct of the trial, from beginning to end, is obviously affected ...." (Emphasis altered; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Artis , 314 Conn. 131 , 150, 101 A.3d 915 (2014). "[S]tructural defect cases contain a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself. ... | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Hillmon
green
2 sentences2010Co. v. Hillmon, 188 U.S. 208 , 23 S.Ct. 294 , 47 L.Ed. 446 (1903); see also Pressley v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co., 271 Ill. 622 , 111 N.E. 511 (1916) (retried four times despite no substantial error). [14] A structural error is "a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself.... 2010Co. v. Hillmon, 188 U.S. 208 , 23 S.Ct. 294 , 47 L.Ed. 446 (1903); see also Pressley v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co., 271 Ill. 622 , 111 N.E. 511 (1916) (retried four times despite no substantial error). [14] A structural error is "a defect affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself.... | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Humphries v. District of Columbia
green
2 sentences2010Such errors infect the entire trial process...." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Lopez, 271 Conn. 724, 733 , 859 A.2d 898 (2004). [15] The hypothetical posited by the United States Supreme Court in Humphries v. District of Columbia, supra, 174 U.S. at 194-95 , 19 S.Ct. 637 makes a telling point: "Suppose, after the jury, at the end of a protracted trial, have agreed upon the verdict and come into court to announce it, and after it has been read in open court but before a poll can be had one of the jurors is suddenly stricken dead, can it be that the whole proceeding theretofore ha 2010Such errors infect the entire trial process...." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Lopez, 271 Conn. 724, 733 , 859 A.2d 898 (2004). [15] The hypothetical posited by the United States Supreme Court in Humphries v. District of Columbia, supra, 174 U.S. at 194-95 , 19 S.Ct. 637 makes a telling point: "Suppose, after the jury, at the end of a protracted trial, have agreed upon the verdict and come into court to announce it, and after it has been read in open court but before a poll can be had one of the jurors is suddenly stricken dead, can it be that the whole proceeding theretofore ha | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.