Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kitchensgreen2 sentences2025See State v. Kitchens, 299 Conn. 447, 468 , 10 A.3d 942 (2011). ‘‘Connecticut courts have deemed a claim of instructional error implicitly waived when the defense failed to take exception to, and acquiesced in, the jury instructions following one or more opportunities to review them.’’ Id., 480 . 2025See State v. Kitchens, 299 Conn. 447, 468 , 10 A.3d 942 (2011). ‘‘Connecticut courts have deemed a claim of instructional error implicitly waived when the defense failed to take exception to, and acquiesced in, the jury instructions following one or more opportunities to review them.’’ Id., 480 . | 5 | 8 |
State v. Mungroogreen2 sentences2020See State v. Mungroo, 299 Conn. 667 , 672-73, 11 A.3d 132 (2011). ‘‘Connecticut courts have deemed a claim of instructional error implicitly waived when the defense failed to take exception to, and acqui- esced in, the jury instructions following one or more opportunities to review them. . . . [W]hen the trial court provides counsel with a copy of the proposed jury instructions, allows a meaningful opportunity for their review, solicits comments from counsel regarding changes or modifications and counsel affirmatively accepts the instructions proposed or given, the defendant may be deemed to h 2020See State v. Mungroo, 299 Conn. 667 , 672-73, 11 A.3d 132 (2011). ‘‘Connecticut courts have deemed a claim of instructional error implicitly waived when the defense failed to take exception to, and acqui- esced in, the jury instructions following one or more opportunities to review them. . . . [W]hen the trial court provides counsel with a copy of the proposed jury instructions, allows a meaningful opportunity for their review, solicits comments from counsel regarding changes or modifications and counsel affirmatively accepts the instructions proposed or given, the defendant may be deemed to h | 2 | 2 |
State v. Brewergreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., State v. Brewer, supra, 283 Conn. at 360 , 927 A.2d 825 (defense waived claim regarding unanimity portion of lesser offense instruction by failing to take exception to instruction as given and expressing satisfaction with general instruction after court asked counsel if lesser offense instruction was instruction that counsel had requested). [22] In these *965 cases, in which there was no evidence that the court held an on-the-record discussion of the challenged instruction or that defense counsel failed to object for obvious tactical reasons, the court nonetheless determined that, b 2011See, e.g., State v. Brewer, supra, 283 Conn. at 360 , 927 A.2d 825 (defense waived claim regarding unanimity portion of lesser offense instruction by failing to take exception to instruction as given and expressing satisfaction with general instruction after court asked counsel if lesser offense instruction was instruction that counsel had requested). [22] In these *965 cases, in which there was no evidence that the court held an on-the-record discussion of the challenged instruction or that defense counsel failed to object for obvious tactical reasons, the court nonetheless determined that, b | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences2020The circumstances of the present case are similar to those in State v. Davis, 163 Conn. App. 458 , 136 A.3d 257 (2016). 2020The circumstances of the present case are similar to those in State v. Davis, 163 Conn. App. 458 , 136 A.3d 257 (2016). | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.