Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1993–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Serrano v. Burnsgreen1 sentence1999See id., 422 . | 1 | 1 |
Clohessy v. Bachelorgreen2 sentences1996The plaintiffs claim, in her individual capacity, for bystander emotional distress; see Clohessy v. Bachelor, 237 Conn. 31 , 675 A.2d 852 (1996); is based on § B.4 of the uninsured motorist endorsement of the policy, which provides that an insured includes “[ajnyone for damages he or she is entitled to recover because of ‘bodily injury’ sustained by another ‘insured.’ ” Apparently, the plaintiff brought this claim under the theory that if her decedent fell within the coverage under the uninsured motorist endorsement as an insured, then she could also pursue her derivative claim. 1996The plaintiffs claim, in her individual capacity, for bystander emotional distress; see Clohessy v. Bachelor, 237 Conn. 31 , 675 A.2d 852 (1996); is based on § B.4 of the uninsured motorist endorsement of the policy, which provides that an insured includes “[ajnyone for damages he or she is entitled to recover because of ‘bodily injury’ sustained by another ‘insured.’ ” Apparently, the plaintiff brought this claim under the theory that if her decedent fell within the coverage under the uninsured motorist endorsement as an insured, then she could also pursue her derivative claim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Borelli v. Renaldi
green
1 sentence2024The defendants’ citations to Borelli v. Renaldi, 336 Conn. 1 , 243 A.3d 1064 (2020), in support of their claim are not persuasive, because Borelli held that the decision to initiate a police chase, as distinguished from the manner of driving an emergency vehicle, was protected as a discretionary act under § 52-557n. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Daley v. Kashmanian
green
1 sentence2024In October, 2018, the plaintiff brought a claim of negligence against Davis alleging a violation of § 14- 283, and a claim of indemnification against the city Daley v. Kashmanian, 344 Conn. 464 , 280 A.3d 68 (2022), however, clearly hold that discretionary act immunity under § 52-557n does not apply to driving a motor vehicle in either emergency or nonemergency circum- stances. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Ferreira v. Pringle
green
2 sentences2023The plaintiff brought his claim under § 52-557n (a) (1), the municipal negligence statute, which provides in relevant part: ‘‘Except as otherwise provided by law, a political subdivision of the state shall be liable for damages to person or property caused by: (A) The negli- gent acts or omissions of such political subdivision or any employee, officer or agent thereof acting within the scope of his employment or official duties . . . .’’ (Emphasis added.) This statute provides a specific exception, however, namely, that ‘‘no cause of action shall be maintained for damages resulting from injury 2023The plaintiff brought his claim under § 52-557n (a) (1), the municipal negligence statute, which provides in relevant part: ‘‘Except as otherwise provided by law, a political subdivision of the state shall be liable for damages to person or property caused by: (A) The negli- gent acts or omissions of such political subdivision or any employee, officer or agent thereof acting within the scope of his employment or official duties . . . .’’ (Emphasis added.) This statute provides a specific exception, however, namely, that ‘‘no cause of action shall be maintained for damages resulting from injury | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Malloy v. Town of Colchester
green
1 sentence2013In Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 84 Conn. App. 688 , 864 A.2d 1100 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 906 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004) (Mariculture I), this court reversed in part the judgment of the trial court, holding that the statute under which the plaintiff brought its claim for interest, Me. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Hardy
green
1 sentence2013In Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 84 Conn. App. 688 , 864 A.2d 1100 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 906 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004) (Mariculture I), this court reversed in part the judgment of the trial court, holding that the statute under which the plaintiff brought its claim for interest, Me. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
green
1 sentence2013In Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 84 Conn. App. 688 , 864 A.2d 1100 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 906 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004) (Mariculture I), this court reversed in part the judgment of the trial court, holding that the statute under which the plaintiff brought its claim for interest, Me. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Caruso v. City of Bridgeport
green
1 sentence2008Id., 620-21 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Hughes v. National Car Rental Systems, Inc.
green
2 sentences1997In Hughes v. National Car Rental Systems, Inc., 22 Conn. App. 586 , 577 A.2d 1132 (1990), the plaintiff brought a claim against the owner of a vehicle under § 14-154a without filing suit against the driver of the vehicle. 1997In Hughes v. National Car Rental Systems, Inc., 22 Conn. App. 586 , 577 A.2d 1132 (1990), the plaintiff brought a claim against the owner of a vehicle under § 14-154a without filing suit against the driver of the vehicle. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Achille v. Genoni
green
1 sentence1995The court, citing an Indiana appellate case, stated that "it is not necessarily required that a physician `must physically examine, see or treat the plaintiff, or prescribe medication for another person in order for a physician-patient relationship to exist.'" Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Vandersluis v. Weil
green
1 sentence1993In Vandersluis v. Weil, supra, 354 , the plaintiff brought a claim of vexatious litigation against both the defendant and the defendant's attorney. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.