Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1906–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.green2 sentences1996When the term waiver is used, however, the elements of an estoppel almost invariably appear, and it is quite apparent that it is employed to designate, not a pure waiver but one which has come into an existence of effectiveness through the application of the principles underlying estoppel." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 563-64. 1996When the term waiver is used, however, the elements of an estoppel almost invariably appear, and it is quite apparent that it is employed to designate, not a pure waiver but one which has come into an existence of effectiveness through the application of the principles underlying estoppels." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 563-64 . | 1 | 3 |
S.H.V.C., Inc. v. Roygreen1 sentence1996The apparent difference between certain of the cases becomes one of terms rather than of fundamental principle." S.H.V.C., Inc. v. Roy supra 510; Novella v. Hartford Accident Indemnity Company, supra 564. | 1 | 1 |
Bernhard v. Rochester German Insurancegreen2 sentences1972Co., 79 Conn. 388, 393, 65 A. 134 . 1972Co., 79 Conn. 388, 393, 65 A. 134 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stickney v. Hammond
neutral
2 sentences1953Security Co. v. Snow, 70 Conn. 288, 294 , 39 Atl. 153 ; Stickney v. Hammond, 138 Mass. 116, 120 ; Clarkson v. Clarkson, 2 Sw. & Tr. 497.” Strong’s Appeal, 79 Conn. 123, 125 , 63 A. 1089 . 1906Security Co. v. Snow, 70 Conn. 288, 294 , 39 Atl. 153 ; Stickney v. Hammond, 138 Mass. 116, 120 ; Clarkson v. Clarkson, 2 Sw. & Tr. 497. | 2 | 1906–1953 |
Security Co. v. Snow
green
2 sentences1953Security Co. v. Snow, 70 Conn. 288, 294 , 39 Atl. 153 ; Stickney v. Hammond, 138 Mass. 116, 120 ; Clarkson v. Clarkson, 2 Sw. & Tr. 497.” Strong’s Appeal, 79 Conn. 123, 125 , 63 A. 1089 . 1953Security Co. v. Snow, 70 Conn. 288, 294 , 39 Atl. 153 ; Stickney v. Hammond, 138 Mass. 116, 120 ; Clarkson v. Clarkson, 2 Sw. & Tr. 497.” Strong’s Appeal, 79 Conn. 123, 125 , 63 A. 1089 . | 2 | 1906–1953 |
Barton v. Barton
green
1 sentence1997CT Page 6952 ". . . an application to open a judgment by default, [nonsuit] unless at least it is based on a pure error of law, is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and we cannot hold that the trial court in this instance did not exercise a proper discretion in denying the motion." Barton v. Barton, 123 Conn. 487 . 491. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Walsh
green
2 sentences1996In Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Walsh, 218 Conn. 681 , 590 A.2d 957 (1991), the court outlined two elements which must be demonstrated in order to assert an implied waiver or estoppel claim, "Under Connecticut law, any claim of estoppel is predicated on proof of two essential elements: the party against whom estoppel is claimed must do or say something calculated or intended to induce another party to believe that certain facts exist and to act on that belief; and the other party must change its position in reliance on those facts, thereby incurring some injury. . . . 1996In Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Walsh, 218 Conn. 681 , 590 A.2d 957 (1991), the court outlined two elements which must be demonstrated in order to assert an implied waiver or estoppel claim, "Under Connecticut law, any claim of estoppel is predicated on proof of two essential elements: the party against whom estoppel is claimed must do or say something calculated or intended to induce another party to believe that certain facts exist and to act on that belief; and the other party must change its position in reliance on those facts, thereby incurring some injury. . . . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Boyce v. Allstate Insurance Company, No. Cv 90-0374599s (Jan. 4, 1994)
neutral
1 sentence1996"If conduct or action on the part of the [defendant] is responsible for the [plaintiff's] failure to comply in time with the conditions precedent . . . injustice is avoided and adequate relief assured without doing violence to the plain language used by the legislature, by resort to traditional principles of waiver and estoppel." Boyce v. Allstate Insurance Co., Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, Docket No. 374599 (January 4, 1994, Corradino, J., 9 CSCR 90 ). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
S.H.V.C., Inc. v. Roy
green
1 sentence1995The apparent difference CT Page 1198-ZZ between certain of the cases becomes one of terms rather than of fundamental principle." S.H.V.C., Inc. v. Roy, 188 Conn. 503 . 510 (1982). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Strong's Appeal
green
2 sentences1953Security Co. v. Snow, 70 Conn. 288, 294 , 39 Atl. 153 ; Stickney v. Hammond, 138 Mass. 116, 120 ; Clarkson v. Clarkson, 2 Sw. & Tr. 497.” Strong’s Appeal, 79 Conn. 123, 125 , 63 A. 1089 . 1953Security Co. v. Snow, 70 Conn. 288, 294 , 39 Atl. 153 ; Stickney v. Hammond, 138 Mass. 116, 120 ; Clarkson v. Clarkson, 2 Sw. & Tr. 497.” Strong’s Appeal, 79 Conn. 123, 125 , 63 A. 1089 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.