Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1882–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Internal Medicine Alliance, LLC v. Budellgreen2 sentences2008Internal Medicine Alliance v. Budell, 290 Ga.App. 231, 238 (5), n. 4, 659 S.E.2d 668 (2008). 2008Internal Medicine Alliance v. Budell, 290 Ga.App. 231, 238 (5), n. 4, 659 S.E.2d 668 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
Peeples v. Newmangreen2 sentences1969Hill v. Rivers, supra. Since it does not appear that there is any substantial reason why the plaintiff in error should be deprived of the custody of the children here involved, and since it has not been shown that there has been any substantial change in conditions since the original decree was rendered, the judgment of the court below was error.” Peeples v. Newman, 209 Ga. 53, 57 ( 70 SE2d 749 ). 1969Hill v. Rivers, supra. Since it does not appear that there is any substantial reason why the plaintiff in error should be deprived of the custody of the children here involved, and since it has not been shown that there has been any substantial change in conditions since the original decree was rendered, the judgment of the court below was error.” Peeples v. Newman, 209 Ga. 53, 57 ( 70 SE2d 749 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Walker v. First National Bank
neutral
1 sentence1963Johnson v. Henry & Co., 178 Ga. 542 ( 174 SE 140 ); Carhart v. Mackle, 22 Ga. App. 520 ( 96 SE 591 ); Southern Flour &c. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Johnson v. Henry & Co.
neutral
1 sentence1963Johnson v. Henry & Co., 178 Ga. 542 ( 174 SE 140 ); Carhart v. Mackle, 22 Ga. App. 520 ( 96 SE 591 ); Southern Flour &c. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Carhart v. Mackle
green
2 sentences1963Johnson v. Henry & Co., 178 Ga. 542 ( 174 SE 140 ); Carhart v. Mackle, 22 Ga. App. 520 ( 96 SE 591 ); Southern Flour &c. 1963Johnson v. Henry & Co., 178 Ga. 542 ( 174 SE 140 ); Carhart v. Mackle, 22 Ga. App. 520 ( 96 SE 591 ); Southern Flour &c. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Richter v. Macon Gas Co.
neutral
1 sentence1918Richter v. Macon Gas Co., ante, 600 ( 95 S. E. 10 ). | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Hays v. Eubanks
green
1 sentence1906Hays v. Eubanks, 125 Ga. 349 . | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Varner v. State
neutral
1 sentence1902In Varner v. State, 110 Ga. 595 , the plaintiff in error had been convicted in the court below of a violation of tbis section of the Penal Code, upon proof showing that he “had made an 'arrangement with two persons, under which they were to go to the State of Florida and there to be employed in cutting turpentine boxes;” and “that the purpose of each of these persons was to go to the State of Florida to work, and that neither had any present intention of taking up his residence there.” This court held that, as an emigrant is “ one who quits his country for any lawful reason, with a design to s | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Green v. State
green
1 sentence1894Counsel for the plaintiff in error relied upon the case of Green v. The State, 88 Ga. 516 , in which it was held that the court below erred in not excluding a confession which the accused was led to make by the statement that it might be best for him to tell. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Brady v. Brady
neutral
1 sentence1883Judgment affirmed. 67 Ga. 368 . 68 Ga., 811 . | 1 | 1883–1883 |
Water Lot Co. v. Bank of Brunswick
green
1 sentence1882To these rulings plaintiff in error excepted. - If the legal effect of the rule and answer of the sheriff was such a return as to the execution as saved the bar of the statute, then the evidence objected to was competent and relevant; and that such was the legal effect of such a proceeding in court as to this fi. fa. to arrest the running of the statute and establish a new point from which it began again to run, has been so repeatedly ruled by this court in principle that it may not now be questioned. 53 Ga., 30 ; 49 Ib., 576; 39 Ib., 415; 56 Ib., 536; 41 Ib., 133; 42 Ib., 212; 25 Ib., 276. | 1 | 1882–1882 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.