Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1864–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baker v. Hansengreen2 sentences2012“With ‘jurisdictional-based’ fundamental-error review, an appellate court may reverse the judgment of the court below for error—without conducting a review for harm—even if the error is not preserved.” In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d at 291 (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (citing Baker v. Hansen, 679 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Tex. 1984)). 2012Underwriters, Inc., 157 Tex. 475 , 304 S.W.2d 265, 266 (1957); see also In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d 256, 290-92 (Tex.2002) (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (discussing fundamental-error doctrine). ‘With ‘jurisdictional-based’ fundamental— error review, an appellate court may reverse the judgment of the court below for error-without conducting a review for harm — even if the error is not preserved.” In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d at 291 (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (citing Baker v. Hansen, 679 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Tex.1984)). | 9 | 9 |
In Re JFCgreen2 sentences2012Underwriters, Inc., 157 Tex. 475 , 304 S.W.2d 265, 266 (1957); see also In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d 256, 290-92 (Tex.2002) (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (discussing fundamental-error doctrine). ‘With ‘jurisdictional-based’ fundamental— error review, an appellate court may reverse the judgment of the court below for error-without conducting a review for harm — even if the error is not preserved.” In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d at 291 (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (citing Baker v. Hansen, 679 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Tex.1984)). 2012Underwriters, Inc., 157 Tex. 475 , 304 S.W.2d 265, 266 (1957); see also In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d 256, 290-92 (Tex.2002) (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (discussing fundamental-error doctrine). ‘With ‘jurisdictional-based’ fundamental— error review, an appellate court may reverse the judgment of the court below for error-without conducting a review for harm — even if the error is not preserved.” In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d at 291 (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (citing Baker v. Hansen, 679 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Tex.1984)). | 3 | 3 |
McCauley v. Consolidated Underwritersgreen2 sentences2012Underwriters, Inc., 157 Tex. 475 , 304 S.W.2d 265, 266 (1957); see also In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d 256, 290-92 (Tex.2002) (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (discussing fundamental-error doctrine). ‘With ‘jurisdictional-based’ fundamental— error review, an appellate court may reverse the judgment of the court below for error-without conducting a review for harm — even if the error is not preserved.” In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d at 291 (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (citing Baker v. Hansen, 679 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Tex.1984)). 2012Underwriters, Inc., 157 Tex. 475 , 304 S.W.2d 265, 266 (1957); see also In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d 256, 290-92 (Tex.2002) (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (discussing fundamental-error doctrine). ‘With ‘jurisdictional-based’ fundamental— error review, an appellate court may reverse the judgment of the court below for error-without conducting a review for harm — even if the error is not preserved.” In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d at 291 (O’Neill, J., dissenting) (citing Baker v. Hansen, 679 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Tex.1984)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bowie Memorial Hospital v. Wright
green
1 sentence2011The standard of care for a post-operative kidney transplant patient is to have a blood assessment, at the very minimum, every six hours, post-operatively, which 4 Hypovolemic means having “a decreased amount of blood in the body.” Id. at 939 . 9 would include a basic metabolic panel. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Fitz-Gerald v. Hull
green
1 sentence1957Quoting Judge Griffin again in Fitz-Gerald v. Hull, in his reference to Art. 7425b-2 he says [ 150 Tex. 39 , 237 S.W.2d 259 ]: “The only purpose the Legislature could possibly have had in thus amend *730 ing Sec. 2, was to make more definite just what trusts were covered by the Act, and to state in so many words that the Act was not meant to apply to resulting or constructive trusts * * Admittedly, Wilson and Therrell were joint adventurers in the promotion of the oil assignment. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Gardner v. Wesner
green
1 sentence1946Gardner v. Wesner, Tex.Civ.App., 55 S.W. 2d 1104 ; Morris Plan Bank of Ft. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Sutton v. State
green
1 sentence1876Our supreme court, in the case of Sutton v. The State, 41 Texas, 513 , says : “ In cases of felony we are not restricted to the assignment of errors. | 1 | 1876–1876 |
Patrick v. Roach
neutral
1 sentence1864It was settled when this case was before this court on a former appeal, ( 21 Tex., 251 ,) that the plaintiff in the court below could only claim damages for the use and occupation of the premises subsequent to the 22d of April, 1856, the date of the recision of the contract under which John M. | 1 | 1864–1864 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.