Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See Moore v. State , 278 Ga. 473 , 474 (2), 604 S.E.2d 139 (2004) ("although there is no constitutional right to a speedy indictment or to be arrested, certain pre-indictment delays might rise to a denial of due process," but alleged denial of due process for pre-indictment delay will not be addressed for first time on appeal). 4. 2018See Moore v. State , 278 Ga. 473 , 474 (2), 604 S.E.2d 139 (2004) ("although there is no constitutional right to a speedy indictment or to be arrested, certain pre-indictment delays might rise to a denial of due process," but alleged denial of due process for pre-indictment delay will not be addressed for first time on appeal). 4. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Mobleygreen2 sentences2017See State v. Mobley, 296 Ga. 876, 877 ( 770 SE2d 1 ) (2015). 3 Decided January 23, 2017. 2017See State v. Mobley, 296 Ga. 876, 877 ( 770 SE2d 1 ) (2015). 3 Decided January 23, 2017. | 2 | 2 |
Ruiz v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See Ruiz v. State, 286 Ga. 146, 149 (2) (b) ( 686 SE2d 253 ) (2009). 2019See Ruiz v. State, 286 Ga. 146, 149 (2) (b) ( 686 SE2d 253 ) (2009). | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2017Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668, 687 (III) ( 104 SCt 2052 , 80 LE2d 674) (1984). 2017Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668, 687 (III) ( 104 SCt 2052 , 80 LE2d 674) (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Caver v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa 2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa | 1 | 1 |
Minter v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa 2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa | 1 | 1 |
Wright v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa 2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa | 1 | 1 |
Bacon v. Stategreen2 sentences2005The exceptions to the rule are not applicable here. 18 (Footnote omitted.) Bacon v. State, 249 Ga. App. 347, 348-349 (1) ( 548 SE2d 78 ) (2001). 19 By failing to invoke a ruling on Morrison’s motion to dismiss, trial counsel waived that issue for purposes of appeal. 2005The exceptions to the rule are not applicable here. 18 (Footnote omitted.) Bacon v. State, 249 Ga. App. 347, 348-349 (1) ( 548 SE2d 78 ) (2001). 19 By failing to invoke a ruling on Morrison’s motion to dismiss, trial counsel waived that issue for purposes of appeal. | 1 | 1 |
King v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa 2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa | 1 | 1 |
Copeland v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa 2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa | 1 | 1 |
Lynott v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa 2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa | 1 | 1 |
Ingram v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa 2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa | 1 | 1 |
Nash v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa 2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa | 1 | 1 |
Edmonds v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa 2005Wright v. State, 259 Ga. App. 74, 77 (3) ( 576 SE2d 64 ) (2003); see Lynott v. State, 198 Ga. App. 688, 691 (7) ( 402 SE2d 747 ) (1991) (argument that trial court had no jurisdiction over appellant because of the state’s failure to comply with the IAD was not raised at trial and thus was not preserved for appellate review). 20 (Citation omitted.) Minter v. State, 245 Ga. App. 327, 331 (6) ( 537 SE2d 769 ) (2000). 21 (Citation omitted.) Caver v. State, 215 Ga. App. 711, 713 (4) ( 452 SE2d 515 ) (1994). 22 See King v. State, 169 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 313 SE2d 144 ) (1984) (prior conviction necessa | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Taylor v. State, 272 Ga. 559, 562 (2) (d) ( 532 SE2d 395 ) (2000) (where reference to defendant’s silence was not objectionable, trial counsel’s failure to object was not deficient assistance of counsel). 2001Taylor v. State, 272 Ga. 559, 562 (2) (d) ( 532 SE2d 395 ) (2000) (where reference to defendant’s silence was not objectionable, trial counsel’s failure to object was not deficient assistance of counsel). | 1 | 1 |
Pullen v. Stategreen2 sentences2001“A party cannot ignore during a trial that which he thinks to be error or an injustice and take his chances on a favorable outcome and then complain later.” (Punctuation omitted.) Kemp v. Rouse-Atlanta, Inc., 207 Ga. App. 876, 882 ( 429 SE2d 264 ) (1993); see also Pullen v. State, 208 Ga. App. 581, 583 (2) (b) ( 431 SE2d 696 ) (1993). 2001“A party cannot ignore during a trial that which he thinks to be error or an injustice and take his chances on a favorable outcome and then complain later.” (Punctuation omitted.) Kemp v. Rouse-Atlanta, Inc., 207 Ga. App. 876, 882 ( 429 SE2d 264 ) (1993); see also Pullen v. State, 208 Ga. App. 581, 583 (2) (b) ( 431 SE2d 696 ) (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Kemp v. Rouse-Atlanta, Inc.green2 sentences2001“A party cannot ignore during a trial that which he thinks to be error or an injustice and take his chances on a favorable outcome and then complain later.” (Punctuation omitted.) Kemp v. Rouse-Atlanta, Inc., 207 Ga. App. 876, 882 ( 429 SE2d 264 ) (1993); see also Pullen v. State, 208 Ga. App. 581, 583 (2) (b) ( 431 SE2d 696 ) (1993). 2001“A party cannot ignore during a trial that which he thinks to be error or an injustice and take his chances on a favorable outcome and then complain later.” (Punctuation omitted.) Kemp v. Rouse-Atlanta, Inc., 207 Ga. App. 876, 882 ( 429 SE2d 264 ) (1993); see also Pullen v. State, 208 Ga. App. 581, 583 (2) (b) ( 431 SE2d 696 ) (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Pattillo v. Stategreen2 sentences1996See Pattillo v. State, 250 Ga. 510, 512 ( 299 SE2d 710 ); Jones v. State, 165 Ga. App. 36, 38 ( 299 SE2d 576 ). 1996See Pattillo v. State, 250 Ga. 510, 512 ( 299 SE2d 710 ); Jones v. State, 165 Ga. App. 36, 38 ( 299 SE2d 576 ). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences1996See Pattillo v. State, 250 Ga. 510, 512 ( 299 SE2d 710 ); Jones v. State, 165 Ga. App. 36, 38 ( 299 SE2d 576 ). 1996See Pattillo v. State, 250 Ga. 510, 512 ( 299 SE2d 710 ); Jones v. State, 165 Ga. App. 36, 38 ( 299 SE2d 576 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.