facts presented bar (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

facts presented bar in Illinois

9 Illinois opinions name it 3 courts 1979–2024 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Davisgreen
illappct · 2004 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Based on the facts presented at the hearing, the opposite conclusion is not “clearly evident.” See People v. Davis, 352 Ill.

11
The PEOPLE v. Taylorgreen
ill · 1971 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
2 sentences

1982We note initially that defendants have strongly argued that the instant case presents evidence as improbable as that which warranted reversal in People v. Taylor (1971), 48 Ill. 2d 91 , 268 N.E.2d 865 ; however, even a cursory reading of the evidence summarized in that opinion reveals a situation wholly unlike the facts presented at bar.

1982We note initially that defendants have strongly argued that the instant case presents evidence as improbable as that which warranted reversal in People v. Taylor (1971), 48 Ill. 2d 91 , 268 N.E.2d 865 ; however, even a cursory reading of the evidence summarized in that opinion reveals a situation wholly unlike the facts presented at bar.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Margaret M. Carver and Randall S. Carmean v. Sheriff of Lasalle County, Illinois, and Lasalle County, Illinois green
ca7 · 2001
2 sentences

2003Although it may initially appear that this statute is applicable to the instant cause, we agree with the Seventh Circuit in Carver II that a close examination of section 5 — 1002 reveals that, under the specific facts presented at bar, section 5 — 1002 “does not provide a silver bullet here.” Carver II, 243 F.3d at 384 .

2003Although it may initially appear that this statute is applicable to the instant cause, we agree with the Seventh Circuit in Carver II that a close examination of section 5–1002 reveals that, under the specific facts presented at bar, section 5–1002 “does not provide a silver bullet here.” Carver II , 243 F.3d at 384 .

22003–2003
People v. Inman green
illappct · 2023
1 sentence

2024Despite the form notice including space for the defendant to elaborate this claim, the “defendant made no further reference to the record or the facts presented at the hearing or through exhibits, made no additional argument, and cited no authority in support of his claim.” Id.

12024–2024
People v. Johnson green
ill · 2010
1 sentence

2021Id. -9- ¶ 34 The United States Constitution and the Illinois Constitution protect people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.

12021–2021
Best v. Taylor MacHine Works green
ill · 1997
2 sentences

2001We continue to adhere to the belief that "the rationale of the Petrillo court is sound." Best, 179 Ill.2d at 458 , 228 Ill.Dec. 636 , 689 N.E.2d 1057 .

2001We continue to adhere to the belief that "the rationale of the Petrillo court is sound." Best, 179 Ill.2d at 458 , 228 Ill.Dec. 636 , 689 N.E.2d 1057 .

12001–2001
Peterson v. State neutral
ilclaimsct · 1984
1 sentence

1989In the case of Peterson v. State (1984), 37 Ill.

11989–1989
Wilkey v. Illinois Racing Board green
illappct · 1978
1 sentence

1979App. 3d 534 , 381 N.E.2d 1380 .) Whether or not the additional burden of the Drezner test applies here, under either standard there is no support for the IDPA decision to terminate Dr. Tanquilut based upon the facts presented at the hearing.

11979–1979

Where else courts name it

NY 10 (1909–2024) IL 9 (1979–2024) NH 8 (2002–2020) FL 6 (1972–2019) CA 5 (1942–2025) PA 5 (1964–2020) MD 3 (1969–1999) AL 3 (1914–2006) OH 3 (1986–2021) AR 2 (2009–2018) WI 2 (1931–1979) TX 2 (1985–1996) NC 2 (2022–2022) LA 2 (1985–2014) IN 2 (1976–1981) VA 2 (1982–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check