Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tillman v. Baskingreen2 sentences1989Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509, 511 (Fla.1972) (quoting Rogge, 368 P.2d at 813 ). 1975Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972). | 1 | 2 |
Leeds Shoes v. Cucuzzagreen2 sentences1989While the deputy had the prerogative, if the facts presented at the hearing were at variance with those agreed upon, and good cause existed for such modification, to reject the parties' stipulation agreeing that claimant had suffered some degree of PI, Leeds Shoes v. Cucuzza, 429 So.2d 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), the facts at bar reflect only that there was conflicting medical testimony regarding whether claimant had suffered any PI. 1986Espada Enterprises, Inc. v. Spiro, 481 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Leeds Shoes v. Cucuzza, 429 So.2d 401, 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Woods v. Greater Naples Care Center, 406 So.2d 1172, 1173 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), rev. denied, 413 So.2d 876 (Fla.1982). | 1 | 2 |
Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Browardgreen1 sentence2019Co. v. Broward Cty., 665 So. 2d 272, 274-75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (accepting the rule that every tax year stands alone and finding on the facts presented that the rule was not violated); Op. Att’y Gen. | 1 | 1 |
Woods v. Greater Naples Care Centergreen1 sentence1986Espada Enterprises, Inc. v. Spiro, 481 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Leeds Shoes v. Cucuzza, 429 So.2d 401, 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Woods v. Greater Naples Care Center, 406 So.2d 1172, 1173 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), rev. denied, 413 So.2d 876 (Fla.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Espada Enterprises, Inc. v. Spirogreen1 sentence1986Espada Enterprises, Inc. v. Spiro, 481 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Leeds Shoes v. Cucuzza, 429 So.2d 401, 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Woods v. Greater Naples Care Center, 406 So.2d 1172, 1173 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), rev. denied, 413 So.2d 876 (Fla.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Arbenz Ex Rel. Seipt v. Deboutgreen1 sentence1972Accord, Arbenz v. Bebout, Wyo. 1968, 444 P.2d 317 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rogge v. Weaver
green
2 sentences1989Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509, 511 (Fla.1972) (quoting Rogge, 368 P.2d at 813 ). 1972If, after denial of the motion, the defendant declines to present any evidence, the judge must, of course, then exercise his own judgment in applying the law to the facts presented and rule on the motion and decide the case." Rogge v. Weaver, Alaska 1962, 368 P.2d 810, 813 . | 2 | 1972–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.