Thereafter defendant in Illinois

1981App. 3d 918, 920-21 , 357 N.E.2d 840 .) Thereafter defendant must show payment of the amount found due to prevent an adverse final judgment against him.

1979The mineral lease involved there had a term “ ° for ° 5 years and as long thereafter as oil, gas or other mineral is produced from said land * * V ” ( 228 Ore. 180, 186 , 364 P.2d 773, 776 .) The defendant-lessee argued that the thereafter clause was a condition subsequent which required notice before the lease would terminate.

1979The mineral lease involved there had a term “ ° for ° 5 years and as long thereafter as oil, gas or other mineral is produced from said land * * V ” ( 228 Ore. 180, 186 , 364 P.2d 773, 776 .) The defendant-lessee argued that the thereafter clause was a condition subsequent which required notice before the lease would terminate.

1979App. 3d 482 , 308 N.E.2d 235 .) Thereafter defendant filed a post-conviction petition (Ill.

1978App. 3d 540 , 325 N.E.2d 753 .) Thereafter defendant filed his pro se petition seeking post-conviction relief.

1971From defendant’s attitude before the trial court, evidence there offered, his contrition and other circumstances, we consider his to be a proper case for a reduction of sentence, so that defendant may be allowed to continue normal commurnty contacts without further exposure to the “* * * stultifying effects of confinement which often * * * complicate the reintegration of the offender into the community * * *." People v. McClendon, supra. We therefore modify the sentence imposed, reducing the minimum from two years to one year and reducing the maximum from five years to the time served.

1967Thereafter defendant appealed to this court and his conviction was affirmed. ( 27 Ill.2d 331 .) He then filed a petition for hearing under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act and the State filed a motion to dismiss, which was sustained and the petition dismissed.

1953(People v. Davis, 406 Ill. 215 .) Thereafter defendant filed a petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, the State’s Attorney answered the petition, and an attorney was appointed to represent defendant.

1943It is unnecessary to recite the facts, as they are fully set out in 304 Ill.

1937Defendant’s theory is “that this case is identical with and controlled by the cases of Beilin v. Krenn & Dato, Inc., 350 Ill. 284 , and Weissbrodt v. Elmore, 262 Ill.

1937Defendant’s theory is “that this case is identical with and controlled by the cases of Beilin v. Krenn & Dato, Inc., 350 Ill. 284 , and Weissbrodt v. Elmore, 262 Ill.