report hearing in Kansas

9 Kansas opinions name it 3 courts 1972–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Warden v. Exempla, Inc.green colo · 2012 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 1 sentence 2016In reaching this decision, the Warden court noted that the rebuttal expert did not offer a new theory of the case; instead, the expert undercut the defense’s expert by attacking the report the defense expert relied on. 291 P.3d at 36, ¶ 28 .	1	1
In Re Carsongreen kan · 1993 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002In doing so, our standard was set forth in In re Carson, 252 Kan. 399, 406 , 845 P.2d 47 770 (1992) (quoting State v. Klassen, 207 Kan. 414, 415 , 485 P.2d 1295 [1971]) where we stated we have a “ ‘duty in a disciplinary proceeding to examine the evidence and determine for ourselves the judgment to be entered.’ ” The report of the hearing panel “is advisory only, it will be given the same dignity as a special verdict by a jury, or the findings of a trial court, and will be adopted where amply sustained by the evidence, or where it is not against the clear weight of the evidence, or where the 2002In doing so, our standard was set forth in In re Carson, 252 Kan. 399, 406 , 845 P.2d 47 770 (1992) (quoting State v. Klassen, 207 Kan. 414, 415 , 485 P.2d 1295 [1971]) where we stated we have a “ ‘duty in a disciplinary proceeding to examine the evidence and determine for ourselves the judgment to be entered.’ ” The report of the hearing panel “is advisory only, it will be given the same dignity as a special verdict by a jury, or the findings of a trial court, and will be adopted where amply sustained by the evidence, or where it is not against the clear weight of the evidence, or where the	1	1
In re Leitnergreen kan · 1994 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (30)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Zeigler green kan · 1975 2 sentences 2002In doing so, our standard was set forth in In re Carson, 252 Kan. 399, 406 , 845 P.2d 47 770 (1992) (quoting State v. Klassen, 207 Kan. 414, 415 , 485 P.2d 1295 [1971]) where we stated we have a “ ‘duty in a disciplinary proceeding to examine the evidence and determine for ourselves the judgment to be entered.’ ” The report of the hearing panel “is advisory only, it will be given the same dignity as a special verdict by a jury, or the findings of a trial court, and will be adopted where amply sustained by the evidence, or where it is not against the clear weight of the evidence, or where the 2002In doing so, our standard was set forth in In re Carson, 252 Kan. 399, 406 , 845 P.2d 47 770 (1992) (quoting State v. Klassen, 207 Kan. 414, 415 , 485 P.2d 1295 [1971]) where we stated we have a “ ‘duty in a disciplinary proceeding to examine the evidence and determine for ourselves the judgment to be entered.’ ” The report of the hearing panel “is advisory only, it will be given the same dignity as a special verdict by a jury, or the findings of a trial court, and will be adopted where amply sustained by the evidence, or where it is not against the clear weight of the evidence, or where the	1	2002–2002
State v. Klassen green kan · 1971 2 sentences 2002In doing so, our standard was set forth in In re Carson, 252 Kan. 399, 406 , 845 P.2d 47 770 (1992) (quoting State v. Klassen, 207 Kan. 414, 415 , 485 P.2d 1295 [1971]) where we stated we have a “ ‘duty in a disciplinary proceeding to examine the evidence and determine for ourselves the judgment to be entered.’ ” The report of the hearing panel “is advisory only, it will be given the same dignity as a special verdict by a jury, or the findings of a trial court, and will be adopted where amply sustained by the evidence, or where it is not against the clear weight of the evidence, or where the 2002In doing so, our standard was set forth in In re Carson, 252 Kan. 399, 406 , 845 P.2d 47 770 (1992) (quoting State v. Klassen, 207 Kan. 414, 415 , 485 P.2d 1295 [1971]) where we stated we have a “ ‘duty in a disciplinary proceeding to examine the evidence and determine for ourselves the judgment to be entered.’ ” The report of the hearing panel “is advisory only, it will be given the same dignity as a special verdict by a jury, or the findings of a trial court, and will be adopted where amply sustained by the evidence, or where it is not against the clear weight of the evidence, or where the	1	2002–2002
State v. Palmer green kan · 1991 1 sentence 1995State v. Palmer , 248 Kan. 681 (1991).	1	1995–1995
In Re Morris green kan · 1992 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In Re Pomeroy neutral kan · 1993 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Gray neutral kan · 1980 1 sentence 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Hutton neutral kan · 1981 1 sentence 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Wriston neutral kan · 1982 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Hyter green kan · 1984 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Sturgis neutral kan · 1986 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Barritt neutral kan · 1988 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Lerner neutral kan · 1989 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Sowers neutral kan · 1989 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Laing neutral kan · 1990 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Dickson green kan · 1992 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Evans neutral kan · 1992 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In re Jarczyk neutral kan · 1992 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
State v. Russo green kan · 1981 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In Re Wilson neutral kan · 1992 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In Re Kershner green kan · 1992 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In Re the Discipline of Evans neutral kan · 1981 2 sentences 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 ( 1994See In re Leitner, 254 Kan. 940 , 869 P.2d 738 (1994); In re Pomeroy, 252 Kan. 1044 , 850 P.2d 222 (1993); In re Jarczyk, 252 Kan. 4 , 847 P.2d 1190 (1992); In re Evans, 252 Kan. 1 , 841 P.2d 461 (1992); In re Morris, 251 Kan. 592 , 834 P.2d 384 (1992); In re Wilson, 251 Kan. 252 , 832 P.2d 347 (1992); In re Dickson, 250 Kan. 1 , 824 P.2d 197 (1992); In re Kershner, 250 Kan. 383 , 827 P.2d 1189 (1992); In re Laing, 246 Kan. 334 , 788 P.2d 284 (1990); In re Lerner, 244 Kan. 342 , 767 P.2d 1319 (1989); In re Sowers, 244 Kan. 594 , 771 P.2d 933 (1989); In re Barritt, 243 Kan. 519 , 757 P.2d 730 (	1	1994–1994
In Re Jackson neutral kan · 1991 2 sentences 1992“The report of a hearing panel of the Board for Discipline of Attorneys, while advisory only, will be given the same dignity as a special verdict by a jury, or the findings of the trial court, and will be adopted where amply supported by the evidence, where it is not against the clear weight of the evidence, or where the evidence consisted of sharply conflicting testimony. [Citation omitted.]” In re Jackson, 249 Kan. 172, 175 , 814 P.2d 958 (1991). 1992“The report of a hearing panel of the Board for Discipline of Attorneys, while advisory only, will be given the same dignity as a special verdict by a jury, or the findings of the trial court, and will be adopted where amply supported by the evidence, where it is not against the clear weight of the evidence, or where the evidence consisted of sharply conflicting testimony. [Citation omitted.]” In re Jackson, 249 Kan. 172, 175 , 814 P.2d 958 (1991).	1	1992–1992
In Re Matney green kan · 1987 2 sentences 1991In re Matney, 241 Kan. 783 , Syl. ¶ 8, 740 P.2d 598 (1987). 1991In re Matney, 241 Kan. 783 , Syl. ¶ 8, 740 P.2d 598 (1987).	1	1991–1991
State v. Boling green kanctapp · 1980 1 sentence 1984App. 2d 371 , 617 P.2d 102 (1980), which provides a thorough analysis of the statutory scheme and the difference between an order ‘suppressing’ evidence obtained in violation of constitutional rights and one ‘excluding’ evidence because of evidentiary rules.” The trial court in the present case excluded results of the blood alcohol test because the State had failed to comply with K.S.A. 8-1002’s requirement that a report of the test be delivered, upon request, to the person submitting to the test.	1	1984–1984
Burden v. State neutral kan · 1979 2 sentences 1982Fairly current information was available in the previous report and no error occurred.” (Emphasis supplied.) In Burden v. State, 225 Kan. 549, 554-55 , 592 P.2d 451 (1979), the court stated: “Under our present statutory requirements (K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 21-4604) a presentence report must be obtained in every case where a defendant is convicted of a felony. 1982Fairly current information was available in the previous report and no error occurred.” (Emphasis supplied.) In Burden v. State, 225 Kan. 549, 554-55 , 592 P.2d 451 (1979), the court stated: “Under our present statutory requirements (K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 21-4604) a presentence report must be obtained in every case where a defendant is convicted of a felony.	1	1982–1982
City of Emporia v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. neutral kan · 1913 2 sentences 1972(City of Emporia v. Railway Co., 88 Kan. 611 , 129 Pac. 161 ; Desser v. City of Wichita, 96 Kan. 820 , 153 Pac. 1194 ; Decker v. City of Wichita, 109 Kan. 796 , 202 Pac. 89 ; City of Emporia v. Humphrey, 132 Kan. 682 , 297 Pac. 712 ; and Peoples Taxicab Co. v. City of Wichita, 140 Kan. 129 , 34 P. 2d 545 .) The Federal Communications Commission published the report of its inquiry into cable television service and cable television relay service in the Federal Register, supra, under Title 47 — Telecommunication, page 3252. 1972(City of Emporia v. Railway Co., 88 Kan. 611 , 129 Pac. 161 ; Desser v. City of Wichita, 96 Kan. 820 , 153 Pac. 1194 ; Decker v. City of Wichita, 109 Kan. 796 , 202 Pac. 89 ; City of Emporia v. Humphrey, 132 Kan. 682 , 297 Pac. 712 ; and Peoples Taxicab Co. v. City of Wichita, 140 Kan. 129 , 34 P. 2d 545 .) The Federal Communications Commission published the report of its inquiry into cable television service and cable television relay service in the Federal Register, supra, under Title 47 — Telecommunication, page 3252.	1	1972–1972
Desser v. City of Wichita green kan · 1915 2 sentences 1972(City of Emporia v. Railway Co., 88 Kan. 611 , 129 Pac. 161 ; Desser v. City of Wichita, 96 Kan. 820 , 153 Pac. 1194 ; Decker v. City of Wichita, 109 Kan. 796 , 202 Pac. 89 ; City of Emporia v. Humphrey, 132 Kan. 682 , 297 Pac. 712 ; and Peoples Taxicab Co. v. City of Wichita, 140 Kan. 129 , 34 P. 2d 545 .) The Federal Communications Commission published the report of its inquiry into cable television service and cable television relay service in the Federal Register, supra, under Title 47 — Telecommunication, page 3252. 1972(City of Emporia v. Railway Co., 88 Kan. 611 , 129 Pac. 161 ; Desser v. City of Wichita, 96 Kan. 820 , 153 Pac. 1194 ; Decker v. City of Wichita, 109 Kan. 796 , 202 Pac. 89 ; City of Emporia v. Humphrey, 132 Kan. 682 , 297 Pac. 712 ; and Peoples Taxicab Co. v. City of Wichita, 140 Kan. 129 , 34 P. 2d 545 .) The Federal Communications Commission published the report of its inquiry into cable television service and cable television relay service in the Federal Register, supra, under Title 47 — Telecommunication, page 3252.	1	1972–1972
Decker v. City of Wichita neutral kan · 1921	1	1972–1972
City of Emporia v. Humphrey green kan · 1931	1	1972–1972
Peoples Taxicab Co. v. City of Wichita neutral kan · 1934	1	1972–1972

Where else courts name it

TX 96 (1979–2026) IL 46 (1969–2024) OH 37 (1986–2026) CA 34 (1962–2025) NY 31 (1929–2023) PA 25 (1893–2024) IN 17 (1893–2020) NJ 13 (1953–2024) MI 13 (1969–2024) MT 11 (2010–2025) KS 9 (1972–2016) CT 9 (1912–2022) LA 9 (1978–2017) ME 9 (1977–2026) MA 9 (1947–2018) WI 8 (1995–2025) MO 8 (1896–2022) CO 8 (1976–2025) NM 8 (1982–2012) WA 7 (1941–2025) GA 7 (1940–2025) MN 7 (1944–2008) FL 7 (1991–2016) MD 7 (1968–2015) MS 7 (1968–2023) NC 6 (1966–2021) KY 6 (1880–2005) NV 6 (2014–2016) OR 5 (1994–2016) OK 5 (1996–2013) AL 5 (1858–1993) IA 5 (1970–2025) VA 4 (1990–2023) UT 4 (1980–2023) SC 4 (1906–2026) ND 4 (2001–2025) ID 3 (2010–2022) HI 3 (1996–2023) VT 3 (1912–1991) WV 3 (1897–2009) WY 2 (1975–2010) TN 2 (1955–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check