5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Formarogreen1 sentence2025And the court considered a variety of mitigating factors, including the report of a defense psychologist requested by Davis, Davis’s age, the recommendations of the pre-sentence investigation report (PSI) writer, Davis’s lack of other criminal history, and that he showed “some remorse.” The court balanced these mitigating factors against the nature of the offense—what the court called “pretty disgusting behavior”—and the need to protect the community from future criminal conduct. “[T]he decision of the district court to impose a particular sentence within the statutory limits is cloaked with a | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Sean David Gordongreen1 sentence2020“We review sentencing decisions for an abuse of discretion when the sentence is within the statutory limits.” State v. Gordon, 921 N.W.2d 19, 24 (Iowa 2018). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. State
green
1 sentence2021In Jensen, 378 N.W.2d at 713 , where there was an application to revoke probation filed by the State, the Iowa Supreme Court stated in dicta “that a revocation proceeding is commenced with the filing in district court of an application for revocation.” The court in Barker, 479 N.W.2d at 277-78 , relied on this dicta from Jensen in determining the district court retained jurisdiction to revoke the defendant’s probation where only a report of violation had been filed along with a warrant for the probationer’s arrest, without discussing whether there is any difference between an application to re | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Jensen
green
1 sentence2021In Jensen, 378 N.W.2d at 713 , where there was an application to revoke probation filed by the State, the Iowa Supreme Court stated in dicta “that a revocation proceeding is commenced with the filing in district court of an application for revocation.” The court in Barker, 479 N.W.2d at 277-78 , relied on this dicta from Jensen in determining the district court retained jurisdiction to revoke the defendant’s probation where only a report of violation had been filed along with a warrant for the probationer’s arrest, without discussing whether there is any difference between an application to re | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Jacoby
green
1 sentence1984Jacoby, 260 N.W.2d at 840 ; Mayhew, 170 N.W.2d at 614 . 1 We conclude the above general rule, following the Jencks concept, does not apply with respect to any reports prepared by Kemming and Swaim. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Mayhew
green
1 sentence1984Jacoby, 260 N.W.2d at 840 ; Mayhew, 170 N.W.2d at 614 . 1 We conclude the above general rule, following the Jencks concept, does not apply with respect to any reports prepared by Kemming and Swaim. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
MORRIS PLAN LEASING COMPANY v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co.
green
2 sentences1970Considering at this time the matter of pleading, we said in Morris Plan Leasing Co. v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co., 259 Iowa 404, 424 , 143 N.W.2d 404 , 417: “ Where parties proceed without objection to try an issue, even though not presented by the pleadings, it amounts to consent to try such issue and it is then rightfully in the case.’ ” See also Holland v. Holland, Iowa, 161 N.W.2d 744, 746 ; In re Estate of Millers, Iowa, 159 N.W.2d 441, 446 ; and Wilson v. Corbin, 241 Iowa 593, 605 , 41 N.W.2d 702 . 1970Considering at this time the matter of pleading, we said in Morris Plan Leasing Co. v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co., 259 Iowa 404, 424 , 143 N.W.2d 404 , 417: “ Where parties proceed without objection to try an issue, even though not presented by the pleadings, it amounts to consent to try such issue and it is then rightfully in the case.’ ” See also Holland v. Holland, Iowa, 161 N.W.2d 744, 746 ; In re Estate of Millers, Iowa, 159 N.W.2d 441, 446 ; and Wilson v. Corbin, 241 Iowa 593, 605 , 41 N.W.2d 702 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
In Re the Estate of Millers
green
1 sentence1970Considering at this time the matter of pleading, we said in Morris Plan Leasing Co. v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co., 259 Iowa 404, 424 , 143 N.W.2d 404 , 417: “ Where parties proceed without objection to try an issue, even though not presented by the pleadings, it amounts to consent to try such issue and it is then rightfully in the case.’ ” See also Holland v. Holland, Iowa, 161 N.W.2d 744, 746 ; In re Estate of Millers, Iowa, 159 N.W.2d 441, 446 ; and Wilson v. Corbin, 241 Iowa 593, 605 , 41 N.W.2d 702 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Holland v. Holland
green
1 sentence1970Considering at this time the matter of pleading, we said in Morris Plan Leasing Co. v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co., 259 Iowa 404, 424 , 143 N.W.2d 404 , 417: “ Where parties proceed without objection to try an issue, even though not presented by the pleadings, it amounts to consent to try such issue and it is then rightfully in the case.’ ” See also Holland v. Holland, Iowa, 161 N.W.2d 744, 746 ; In re Estate of Millers, Iowa, 159 N.W.2d 441, 446 ; and Wilson v. Corbin, 241 Iowa 593, 605 , 41 N.W.2d 702 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Wilson v. Corbin
green
2 sentences1970Considering at this time the matter of pleading, we said in Morris Plan Leasing Co. v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co., 259 Iowa 404, 424 , 143 N.W.2d 404 , 417: “ Where parties proceed without objection to try an issue, even though not presented by the pleadings, it amounts to consent to try such issue and it is then rightfully in the case.’ ” See also Holland v. Holland, Iowa, 161 N.W.2d 744, 746 ; In re Estate of Millers, Iowa, 159 N.W.2d 441, 446 ; and Wilson v. Corbin, 241 Iowa 593, 605 , 41 N.W.2d 702 . 1970Considering at this time the matter of pleading, we said in Morris Plan Leasing Co. v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co., 259 Iowa 404, 424 , 143 N.W.2d 404 , 417: “ Where parties proceed without objection to try an issue, even though not presented by the pleadings, it amounts to consent to try such issue and it is then rightfully in the case.’ ” See also Holland v. Holland, Iowa, 161 N.W.2d 744, 746 ; In re Estate of Millers, Iowa, 159 N.W.2d 441, 446 ; and Wilson v. Corbin, 241 Iowa 593, 605 , 41 N.W.2d 702 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.