6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLCgreen2 sentences2016"While a treating physician is exempt from the report requirement, this exemption only extends to 'opinions [that] were formed during the course of treatment." Id., 335 P.3d at 189 (quoting Goodman v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011)). 2016"While a treating physician is exempt from the report requirement, this exemption only extends to 'opinions [that] were formed during the course of treatment." Id., 335 P.3d at 189 (quoting Goodman v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011)). | 6 | 6 |
Rock Bay, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of Clarkgreen2 sentences2014Court, 129 Nev. , n.3, 298 P.3d 441 , 445 n.3 (2013) (noting that when an NRCP is modeled after its federal counterpart, "cases interpreting the federal rule are strongly persuasive"). 2014Court, 129 Nev. , n.3, 298 P.3d 441 , 445 n.3 (2013) (noting that when an NRCP is modeled after its federal counterpart, "cases interpreting the federal rule are strongly persuasive"). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.