9 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1912–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Higgins v. Hartford County Bar Asso.green1 sentence1945It is true that the O’Brien case was not concerned with admission without examination, but the principle referred to was reaffirmed in Higgins v. Hartford County Bar Association, supra, 49. | 1 | 1 |
McKeon v. Byingtongreen2 sentences1912This may be done by a committee (McKeon v. Byington, 70 Conn. 429, 432, 39 Atl. 853 ), but unless substantial questions are raised at the hearing which the committee has reason to believe one of the parties will desire to pursue before the court upon remonstrance, it is better to report the ultimate fact, without loading the record with a full report of the hearing. 1912This may be done by a committee (McKeon v. Byington, 70 Conn. 429, 432, 39 Atl. 853 ), but unless substantial questions are raised at the hearing which the committee has reason to believe one of the parties will desire to pursue before the court upon remonstrance, it is better to report the ultimate fact, without loading the record with a full report of the hearing. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Francis v. Fonfara
green
2 sentences2022The statute does not specifically mention admissibility, except with respect to electronic reports, which is not applicable in the present case, and does not state that a failure to mail the report within three days renders the report inadmis- sible. ‘‘A statutory provision that is directory prescribes what shall be done but does not invalidate action upon a failure to comply.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Francis v. Fonfara, 303 Conn. 292, 302 , 33 A.3d 185 (2012). 2022The statute does not specifically mention admissibility, except with respect to electronic reports, which is not applicable in the present case, and does not state that a failure to mail the report within three days renders the report inadmis- sible. ‘‘A statutory provision that is directory prescribes what shall be done but does not invalidate action upon a failure to comply.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Francis v. Fonfara, 303 Conn. 292, 302 , 33 A.3d 185 (2012). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Frantz v. United States Fleet Leasing, Inc.
green
2 sentences2000Furthermore, as in the present case where the defendant questions the enforceability of a lease based on the report requirement, it is hardly imaginable that the legislature would have intended to provide greater protection under this statute to a lessee of residential real estate than a purchaser. "[T]here is a presumption that the legislature intends to accomplish a reasonable and rational result. . . ." Frantz v. United States Fleet Leasing, Inc., 245 Conn. 727 , 738 , 714 A.2d 1222 (1998). 2000Furthermore, as in the present case where the defendant questions the enforceability of a lease based on the report requirement, it is hardly imaginable that the legislature would have intended to provide greater protection under this statute to a lessee of residential real estate than a purchaser. "[T]here is a presumption that the legislature intends to accomplish a reasonable and rational result. . . ." Frantz v. United States Fleet Leasing, Inc., 245 Conn. 727 , 738 , 714 A.2d 1222 (1998). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences1994In a second narrative report that Miranda had prepared, she noted that the victim had stated that the defendant had driven through a rest area on a highway prior to the sexual assault. “[T]he suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.” Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 , 83 S. Ct. 1194 , 10 L. 1994In a second narrative report that Miranda had prepared, she noted that the victim had stated that the defendant had driven through a rest area on a highway prior to the sexual assault. “[T]he suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.” Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 , 83 S. Ct. 1194 , 10 L. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Volck v. Muzio
green
1 sentence1991(See, also, Conn. Agencies Regs. 14-227b-19 concerning the arresting officer's report being admissible if it conforms to requirements of 14-227b (c).) Volck v. Muzio, 204 Conn. 507 , (1987), discussed the admissibility of the report as an exception to the hearsay rule if it complied with the foundation necessary in Section 14-227b (c). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning Commission
green
2 sentences1990The trial court also relied on Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 167 Conn. 202, 207 , 355 A.2d 21 (1974), and Parish of St. 1990The trial court also relied on Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 167 Conn. 202, 207 , 355 A.2d 21 (1974), and Parish of St. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
United States v. Nobles
green
1 sentence1987Id., 238-40 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Andrews v. Cox
green
1 sentence1945The price received upon a fair sale. of property must be assumed to have resulted from a consideration of .“all those elements which an owner or a prospective purchaser could reasonably urge as affecting the fair price of the land”; Andrews v. Cox, 127 Conn. 455, 458 , 17 Atl. (2d) . 507; and among those- considerations undoubtedly would be the likelihood or unlikelihood that within some reasonable time in the future there would be a general increase in the prices paid for similar properties. | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.