Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. St. Amant
green
2 sentences2008Amant, 504 So.2d 1094 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1987), the appellate court held the result of the defendant's Intoxilyzer test was inadmissible at trial; thus, in addressing the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial, the court had to consider whether the remaining evidence, the videotaped field sobriety test and the arresting officer's testimony regarding his sensory impressions, was adequate for the State to have met its burden of proof. 2008Amant, 504 So.2d 1094 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1987), the appellate court held the result of the defendant's Intoxilyzer test was inadmissible at trial; thus, in addressing the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial, the court had to consider whether the remaining evidence, the videotaped field sobriety test and the arresting officer's testimony regarding his sensory impressions, was adequate for the State to have met its burden of proof. | 2 | 2002–2008 |
State v. Washington
green
2 sentences2006State v. Washington, 498 So.2d 136 (La.App. 5 Cir.1986). 2006State v. Washington, 498 So.2d 136 (La.App. 5 Cir.1986). | 2 | 2002–2006 |
State v. Conner
neutral
2 sentences2008LSA-R.S. 32:666 A(3); State v. Conner, 02-363 at 9, 833 So.2d at 403 . 2008LSA-R.S. 32:666 A(3); State v. Conner, 02-363 at 9, 833 So.2d at 403 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Loisel
neutral
2 sentences2002LSA-R.S. 32:666A(3); State v. Loisel, 01-2018 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/6/02) , 812 So.2d 822 . 2002LSA-R.S. 32:666A(3); State v. Loisel, 01-2018 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/6/02) , 812 So.2d 822 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.
green
2 sentences2001Id. at 1120 . 2001Id. at 1120 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Allen
green
2 sentences1999State v. Allen, 440 So.2d 1330 (La. 1983); State v. Courtney, supra. Because Holley refused to take the Intoxilyzer test which measures blood alcohol concentration, the state relied upon subsection (a) of La. 1999State v. Allen, 440 So.2d 1330 (La. 1983); State v. Courtney, supra. Because Holley refused to take the Intoxilyzer test which measures blood alcohol concentration, the state relied upon subsection (a) of La. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Kent
green
2 sentences1998Therefore, State v. Kent, supra , does not support the defendant's argument regarding the sufficiency of evidence in this case. 1998Therefore, State v. Kent, supra , does not support the defendant's argument regarding the sufficiency of evidence in this case. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Kaufman v. State, Dept. of Pub. Safety, Driv. Lic. Div.
green
1 sentence1996Appellant correctly argues it is only necessary to establish the fact that a suspect refused the test, citing Kaufman v. State, Department of Public Safety, Drivers' License Division, 286 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1st Cir.1973), writ denied, 289 So.2d 156 (La.1974). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
McCarthy v. Plaisance
neutral
1 sentence1996Appellant correctly argues it is only necessary to establish the fact that a suspect refused the test, citing Kaufman v. State, Department of Public Safety, Drivers' License Division, 286 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1st Cir.1973), writ denied, 289 So.2d 156 (La.1974). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.