9 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Careygreen1 sentence2008See Carey, 499 So.2d at 288 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tuckergreen1 sentence1994State v. Sims, 426 So.2d 148 (La.1983); State v. Crosby, 403 So.2d 1217 (La.1981); State v. Daniels, 614 So.2d 97 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State v. Tucker, 591 So.2d 1208, 1217 (La. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jernigangreen1 sentence1984See, e.g., State v. Sims, State v. Jernigan, supra. Additionally, we note that Mr. Cooley testified that the defendant told him to “keep the car” until he could pick it up later. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Crosby
green
2 sentences1994State v. Sims, 426 So.2d 148 (La.1983); State v. Crosby, 403 So.2d 1217 (La.1981); State v. Daniels, 614 So.2d 97 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State v. Tucker, 591 So.2d 1208, 1217 (La. 1993State v. Sims, 426 So.2d 148 (La.1983); State v. Crosby, 403 So.2d 1217 (La.1981). | 3 | 1991–1994 |
State v. Jewell
green
2 sentences1991State v. Sims, supra, at p. 153 , citing State v. Crosby, 403 So.2d 1217 (La. 1981), and State v. Jewell, supra. To ensure that the inventory search is not merely a subterfuge to circumvent the warrant requirements of the federal and state constitutions, several factors are considered to be significant in determining whether a true inventory search has occurred: (1) the vehicle could not have remained safely at or near the place it was stopped; (2) the search was not conducted in the field; (3) the tow truck was called before the search commenced; (4) formal impoundment procedures were followe 1991Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 , 107 S.Ct. 738 , 93 L.Ed.2d 739 (1987); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 , 96 S.Ct. 3092 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976); State v. Jewell, 338 So.2d 633 (La.1976). | 3 | 1978–1991 |
State v. Sims
green
2 sentences1994State v. Sims, 426 So.2d 148 (La.1983); State v. Crosby, 403 So.2d 1217 (La.1981); State v. Daniels, 614 So.2d 97 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State v. Tucker, 591 So.2d 1208, 1217 (La. 1993State v. Sims, 426 So.2d 148 (La.1983); State v. Crosby, 403 So.2d 1217 (La.1981). | 2 | 1993–1994 |
South Dakota v. Opperman
green
2 sentences1991Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 , 107 S.Ct. 738 , 93 L.Ed.2d 739 (1987); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 , 96 S.Ct. 3092 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976); State v. Jewell, 338 So.2d 633 (La.1976). 1991Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 , 107 S.Ct. 738 , 93 L.Ed.2d 739 (1987); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 , 96 S.Ct. 3092 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976); State v. Jewell, 338 So.2d 633 (La.1976). | 2 | 1978–1991 |
State v. Schmidt
green
2 sentences1986Hence, the validity of the seizure depends upon the justification for the initial intrusion, i.e., the inventory search exception to the warrant requirement.” 359 So.2d at 135 . 1978State v. Schmidt, supra ; State v. Gaut, supra ; State v. Rome, 354 So.2d 504 (La.1978); State v. Jewell, supra . | 2 | 1978–1986 |
State v. Daniels
green
1 sentence1994State v. Sims, 426 So.2d 148 (La.1983); State v. Crosby, 403 So.2d 1217 (La.1981); State v. Daniels, 614 So.2d 97 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State v. Tucker, 591 So.2d 1208, 1217 (La. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Colorado v. Bertine
green
2 sentences1991Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 , 107 S.Ct. 738 , 93 L.Ed.2d 739 (1987); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 , 96 S.Ct. 3092 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976); State v. Jewell, 338 So.2d 633 (La.1976). 1991Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 , 107 S.Ct. 738 , 93 L.Ed.2d 739 (1987); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 , 96 S.Ct. 3092 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976); State v. Jewell, 338 So.2d 633 (La.1976). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Gaut
green
1 sentence1978State v. Schmidt, supra ; State v. Gaut, supra ; State v. Rome, 354 So.2d 504 (La.1978); State v. Jewell, supra . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Rome
green
1 sentence1978State v. Schmidt, supra ; State v. Gaut, supra ; State v. Rome, 354 So.2d 504 (La.1978); State v. Jewell, supra . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.