Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Rosieregreen2 sentences2001LSA-R.S. 15:438 provides that when evidence is circumstantial, the applicable rule is that, "assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence." In Rosiere, 488 So.2d at 965, 968 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: This is not a purely separate test from the Jackson sufficiency standard to be applied instead of a sufficiency of the evidence test whenever circumstantial evidence forms the basis of the conviction. 2000LSA-R.S. 15:438 provides that when evidence is circumstantial, the applicable rule is that, “assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” In State v. Rosiere, supra, 488 So.2d at 965, 968 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: This is not a purely separate test from the Jackson sufficiency standard to be applied instead of a sufficiency of the evidence test whenever circumstantial evidence forms the basis of the conviction. | 5 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Neal v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2008State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 9 (La.6/29/01), 796 So.2d 649, 657 , cert denied, 535 U.S. 940 , 122 S.Ct. 1323 , 152 L.Ed.2d 231 (2002). 2008State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 9 (La.6/29/01), 796 So.2d 649, 657 , cert denied, 535 U.S. 940 , 122 S.Ct. 1323 , 152 L.Ed.2d 231 (2002). | 3 | 2005–2008 |
Zimmerman v. Washington Department of Social and Health Services
green
2 sentences2008State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 9 (La.6/29/01), 796 So.2d 649, 657 , cert denied, 535 U.S. 940 , 122 S.Ct. 1323 , 152 L.Ed.2d 231 (2002). 2006State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 9 (La.6/29/01), 796 So.2d 649, 657 , cert. denied, 535 U.S. 940 , 122 S.Ct. 1323 , 152 L.Ed.2d 231 (2002). | 3 | 2005–2008 |
State v. Neal
green
2 sentences2008State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 9 (La.6/29/01), 796 So.2d 649, 657 , cert denied, 535 U.S. 940 , 122 S.Ct. 1323 , 152 L.Ed.2d 231 (2002). 2006State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 9 (La.6/29/01), 796 So.2d 649, 657 , cert. denied, 535 U.S. 940 , 122 S.Ct. 1323 , 152 L.Ed.2d 231 (2002). | 3 | 2005–2008 |
State v. Cummings
green
1 sentence2005"Ultimately, all evidence, both direct and circumstantial must be sufficient under Jackson to satisfy a rational juror that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Cummings, 95-1377, p. 3 (La.2/28/96), 668 So.2d 1132, 1134 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.