defence bar (Massachusetts) · Go Syfert
← Massachusetts issues

defence bar in Massachusetts

10 Massachusetts opinions name it 2 courts 1870–1964 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Massachusetts courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Bullock v. Haywardgreen
mass · 1865 · cited in 1 Massachusetts opinions naming this issue, 1964–1964
1 sentence

1964Thomson v. Pentecost, 210 Mass. 223, 226; Russell v. Cole, 167 Mass. 6; May v. Western Union Co., 112 Mass. 90 ; Bullock v. Hayward, 10 Allen 460, 462; Sherman v. F. R.

11
Thomson v. Pentecostgreen
mass · 1911 · cited in 1 Massachusetts opinions naming this issue, 1964–1964
1 sentence

1964Thomson v. Pentecost, 210 Mass. 223, 226; Russell v. Cole, 167 Mass. 6; May v. Western Union Co., 112 Mass. 90 ; Bullock v. Hayward, 10 Allen 460, 462; Sherman v. F. R.

11
Doherty v. Inhabitants of Ayergreen
mass · 1908 · cited in 1 Massachusetts opinions naming this issue, 1929–1929
1 sentence

1929See Doherty v. Ayer, 197 Mass. 241 ; Conroy v. Mather, 217 Mass. 91 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
May v. Western Union Telegraph Co. green
mass · 1873
2 sentences

1964Thomson v. Pentecost, 210 Mass. 223, 226; Russell v. Cole, 167 Mass. 6; May v. Western Union Co., 112 Mass. 90 ; Bullock v. Hayward, 10 Allen 460, 462; Sherman v. F. R.

1911May v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 112 Mass. 90, 93 .

21911–1964
Russell v. Cole neutral
mass · 1896
1 sentence

1964Thomson v. Pentecost, 210 Mass. 223, 226; Russell v. Cole, 167 Mass. 6; May v. Western Union Co., 112 Mass. 90 ; Bullock v. Hayward, 10 Allen 460, 462; Sherman v. F. R.

11964–1964
Adams v. Young green
mass · 1909
1 sentence

1963A finding of actual fraudulent intent on the part of the defendant was not necessary to support the conclusion that the sales in bulk act had been violated. 1 ‘ The effect of the statute is to make . . . non-compliance [with its terms] conclusive of fraud as to the creditors of the seller.” Adams v. Young, 200 Mass. 588, 591 .

11963–1963
Howe v. Howe green
mass · 1908
1 sentence

1949Howe v. Howe, 199 Mass. 598, 601 .

11949–1949
Peterson v. Western Union Telegraph Co. neutral
minn · 1898
1 sentence

1943Peterson v. Western Union Telegraph, Co. 72 Minn. 41, 44 .

11943–1943
Maloof v. Post Publishing Co. green
mass · 1940
1 sentence

1943Maloof v. Post Publishing Co. 306 Mass. 279 . (b) It could not properly be ruled as matter of law that the defence of privilege had been made out with respect to the counts now under consideration (counts 3 and 4).

11943–1943
Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad green
mass · 1911
1 sentence

1935Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 208 Mass. 137 .

11935–1935
Thompson v. Globe Newspaper Co. green
mass · 1932
1 sentence

1934The specific charges in the warrant alleged that Thompson ‘procured the commission of larceny by Callahan of eight printed pages, for which he gave Callahan $600.’ Thompson was bailed by David P. Shea in $1000, for hearing tomorrow.” The plaintiff contends that the defendant has not made out the defence of privilege to publish the facts relating to the issuance of the warrant on the criminal complaint which had been made, despite the fact that the privilege of such a publication was upheld on similar facts in the cases reported in 279 Mass. 176, 186-187 .

11934–1934
Conroy v. Mather green
mass · 1914
1 sentence

1929See Doherty v. Ayer, 197 Mass. 241 ; Conroy v. Mather, 217 Mass. 91 .

11929–1929
Connihan v. Thompson green
mass · 1873
1 sentence

1920In such cases any decisive act of affirmance or disaffirmance, if done with knowledge of the facts, determines the legal rights of the parties, once for all.” Connihan v. Thompson, 111 Mass. 270, 272 .

11920–1920
Brow v. Hathaway green
mass · 1866
1 sentence

1870Brow v. Hathaway, 13 Allen, 239 .

11870–1870

Where else courts name it

MA 10 (1870–1964) NY 4 (1861–1909) PA 4 (1923–1936) VA 3 (1827–1889) IN 3 (1831–1888) NC 3 (1893–1897) MO 3 (1879–1887) NJ 3 (1889–1978) MN 2 (1941–1949)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check