Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Massachusetts opinions name it 3 courts 1928–1985 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Massachusetts courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Guerrogreen1 sentence1985The defendant’s “[cjonclusory assertions are insufficient to meet this burden.” Commonwealth v. Guerro, 14 Mass. App. Ct. 743, 746 (1982). (c) Because the judge did not appoint an interpreter for his sentencing hearing, the defendant claims that he was denied his common law right to be meaningfully “present” at that hearing. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. McJunkingreen1 sentence1985See Commonwealth v. McJunkin, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 609, 618-620 (1981). (b) There is nothing in the record to show that defense counsel provided the prosecutor with the defendant’s Cuban *415 convictions. 5 Further, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the judge relied on these convictions in her sentencing decision. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Minot v. Minot
green
1 sentence1960Minot v. Minot, 319 Mass. 253, 260-261 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Jordan v. Ulmer
neutral
1 sentence1955Jordan v. Ulmer, 237 Mass. 577, 579-580 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Bartley v. Phillips
green
1 sentence1953It is clear that the motion for a rehearing was addressed to the discretion of the judge, Bartley v. Phillips, 317 Mass. 35, 40-41 , Souza v. Souza, 325 Mass. 761 ; and there is nothing in the record to show error in the denial of the motion to correct the record. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Souza v. Souza
green
1 sentence1953It is clear that the motion for a rehearing was addressed to the discretion of the judge, Bartley v. Phillips, 317 Mass. 35, 40-41 , Souza v. Souza, 325 Mass. 761 ; and there is nothing in the record to show error in the denial of the motion to correct the record. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Goshein v. Chavenson
neutral
1 sentence1951Goshein v. Chavenson, 261 Mass. 403, 404 . | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Barnes v. Loomis
neutral
1 sentence1940Barnes v. Loomis, 199 Mass. 578, at 581 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Donovan v. City of Haverhill
green
1 sentence1934Donovan v. Haverhill, 247 Mass. 69 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Barrett v. Briry
neutral
1 sentence1929Barrett v. Briry, 256 Mass. 45 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Herrick v. Waitt
green
1 sentence1928Herrick v. Waitt, 224 Mass. 415 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.