Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
N.C. State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Fed. Trade Comm'ngreen2 sentences2017Parker immunity is most often applied to “[s]tate legislation and decision[s] of a state supreme court, acting legislatively rather than judicially” as these “are an undoubted exercise of state sovereign authority.” North Carolina, 135 S Ct at 1110 (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2017Id. at 1111 . 2 This provision has since been relocated in MCL 333.16216(4). 2014 PA 413 . -7- This case does not involve federal antitrust law. | 1 | 1 |
People v. MacKgreen2 sentences2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr 2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr | 1 | 1 |
People v. Hendrickgreen2 sentences2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr 2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr | 1 | 1 |
Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-Appelleesgreen2 sentences1997The Parker analysis has been followed by appellate courts in at least three other federal circuits. 4 Reynolds v School Dist No 1, Denver, Colorado, 69 F3d 1523, 1534 (CA 10, 1995); Pierce v Commonwealth Life Ins Co, 40 F3d 796, 801 (CA 6, 1994); Notari v Denver Water Dep’t, 971 F2d 585, 588-589 (CA 10, 1992); Boger v Wayne Co, 950 F2d 316, 324-325 (CA 6, 1991); Murray v Thistledown Racing Club, Inc, 770 F2d 63, 66-68 (CA 6, 1985); Christensen v Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 767 F2d 340, 343 (CA 7, 1985); Jasany v United States Postal Service, 755 F2d 1244, 1252 (CA 6, 1997The Parker analysis has been followed by appellate courts in at least three other federal circuits. 4 Reynolds v School Dist No 1, Denver, Colorado, 69 F3d 1523, 1534 (CA 10, 1995); Pierce v Commonwealth Life Ins Co, 40 F3d 796, 801 (CA 6, 1994); Notari v Denver Water Dep’t, 971 F2d 585, 588-589 (CA 10, 1992); Boger v Wayne Co, 950 F2d 316, 324-325 (CA 6, 1991); Murray v Thistledown Racing Club, Inc, 770 F2d 63, 66-68 (CA 6, 1985); Christensen v Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 767 F2d 340, 343 (CA 7, 1985); Jasany v United States Postal Service, 755 F2d 1244, 1252 (CA 6, | 1 | 1 |
Reynolds v. School District No. 1green2 sentences1997The Parker analysis has been followed by appellate courts in at least three other federal circuits. 4 Reynolds v School Dist No 1, Denver, Colorado, 69 F3d 1523, 1534 (CA 10, 1995); Pierce v Commonwealth Life Ins Co, 40 F3d 796, 801 (CA 6, 1994); Notari v Denver Water Dep’t, 971 F2d 585, 588-589 (CA 10, 1992); Boger v Wayne Co, 950 F2d 316, 324-325 (CA 6, 1991); Murray v Thistledown Racing Club, Inc, 770 F2d 63, 66-68 (CA 6, 1985); Christensen v Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 767 F2d 340, 343 (CA 7, 1985); Jasany v United States Postal Service, 755 F2d 1244, 1252 (CA 6, 1997The Parker analysis has been followed by appellate courts in at least three other federal circuits. 4 Reynolds v School Dist No 1, Denver, Colorado, 69 F3d 1523, 1534 (CA 10, 1995); Pierce v Commonwealth Life Ins Co, 40 F3d 796, 801 (CA 6, 1994); Notari v Denver Water Dep’t, 971 F2d 585, 588-589 (CA 10, 1992); Boger v Wayne Co, 950 F2d 316, 324-325 (CA 6, 1991); Murray v Thistledown Racing Club, Inc, 770 F2d 63, 66-68 (CA 6, 1985); Christensen v Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 767 F2d 340, 343 (CA 7, 1985); Jasany v United States Postal Service, 755 F2d 1244, 1252 (CA 6, | 1 | 1 |
Sumner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.red2 sentences1997See Sumner v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, 427 Mich 505, 525 ; 398 NW2d 368 (1986). *433 Accordingly, we hold that a reverse discrimination plaintiff who has no direct evidence of discriminatory intent may establish a prima facie claim of gender discrimination under the Civil Rights Act with respect to a promotion decision by showing (i) background circumstances supporting the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against men; (ii) that the plaintiff applied and was qualified for an available promotion; (iii) that, despite plaintiffs qualifications, he was not pr 1997See Sumner v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, 427 Mich 505, 525 ; 398 NW2d 368 (1986). *433 Accordingly, we hold that a reverse discrimination plaintiff who has no direct evidence of discriminatory intent may establish a prima facie claim of gender discrimination under the Civil Rights Act with respect to a promotion decision by showing (i) background circumstances supporting the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against men; (ii) that the plaintiff applied and was qualified for an available promotion; (iii) that, despite plaintiffs qualifications, he was not pr | 1 | 1 |
Grant v. Cottage Hospital Corp.yellow2 sentences1993See also, e.g., Grant v Cottage Hosp Corp, 368 Mich 77, 78; 117 NW2d 90 (1962); Browning v Paddock, 364 Mich 293, 297 ; 111 NW2d 45 (1961); Hardigree v Green, 97 Mich App 62, 65-66 ; 293 NW2d 719 (1980), rev’d on other grounds 409 Mich 913 (1980). 1993See also, e.g., Grant v Cottage Hosp Corp, 368 Mich 77, 78; 117 NW2d 90 (1962); Browning v Paddock, 364 Mich 293, 297 ; 111 NW2d 45 (1961); Hardigree v Green, 97 Mich App 62, 65-66 ; 293 NW2d 719 (1980), rev’d on other grounds 409 Mich 913 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Chisumgreen1 sentence1981People v Turner, 390 Mich 7, 19 ; 210 NW2d 336 (1973), quoting United States v Chisum, 312 F Supp 1307, 1312 (CD Cal, 1970). [2] In Brady and Parker defendants pled guilty to avoid the possibility of a death sentence that could, according to statute, only be imposed after a jury trial. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Harverson
green
2 sentences2017Therefore, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, Harverson, 291 Mich App at 175 , the evidence was sufficient to rebut Parker’s claim of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt, Stevens, 306 Mich App at 630 . 2017Therefore, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, Harverson, 291 Mich App at 175 , the evidence was sufficient to rebut Parker’s claim of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt, Stevens, 306 Mich App at 630 . | 2 | 2017–2017 |
People v. Stevens
green
2 sentences2017Therefore, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, Harverson, 291 Mich App at 175 , the evidence was sufficient to rebut Parker’s claim of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt, Stevens, 306 Mich App at 630 . 2017Therefore, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, Harverson, 291 Mich App at 175 , the evidence was sufficient to rebut Parker’s claim of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt, Stevens, 306 Mich App at 630 . | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Braun v. Ann Arbor Charter Township
neutral
1 sentence2023A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(4) tests the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction, Braun v Ann Arbor Charter Twp, 262 Mich App 154, 157 ; 683 NW2d 755 (2004), while a motion under MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests the factual sufficiency of the complaint, Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 119 ; 597 NW2d 817 (1999). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Braun v. ANN ARBOR CHARTER TP.
green
1 sentence2023A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(4) tests the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction, Braun v Ann Arbor Charter Twp, 262 Mich App 154, 157 ; 683 NW2d 755 (2004), while a motion under MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests the factual sufficiency of the complaint, Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 119 ; 597 NW2d 817 (1999). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Maiden v. Rozwood
green
2 sentences2023A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(4) tests the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction, Braun v Ann Arbor Charter Twp, 262 Mich App 154, 157 ; 683 NW2d 755 (2004), while a motion under MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests the factual sufficiency of the complaint, Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 119 ; 597 NW2d 817 (1999). 2023A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(4) tests the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction, Braun v Ann Arbor Charter Twp, 262 Mich App 154, 157 ; 683 NW2d 755 (2004), while a motion under MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests the factual sufficiency of the complaint, Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 119 ; 597 NW2d 817 (1999). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Hendrick
neutral
1 sentence2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr | 1 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Cotton
green
2 sentences2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr 2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr | 1 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Hendrick
green
2 sentences2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr 2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr | 1 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Kimble
green
2 sentences2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr 2005We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 MCL 750.535(3)(a). 2 MCL 257.625(1)(a). 3 MCL 750.356a(3). 4 The charge or charges to which Parker pleaded guilty are unclear from the disposition document, but we assume from the circumstances of the case that Parker pleaded guilty of violating his probation. 5 MCL 777.1 et seq. 6 People v Hendrick, 261 Mich App 673, 676-677 ; 683 NW2d 218 (2004), aff'd in part and rev’d in part 472 Mich 555 (2005). 7 Id. at 677 , citing People v Cotton, 209 Mich App 82, 83-84 ; 530 NW 2d 495 (1995). 8 Hendrick, supra at 677, citing MCL 777.1 et seq. and MCL 769.34(2). 9 Hendr | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Slagle v. Zoning Board of Appeals
green
2 sentences1996The zoning board should complete further proceedings consistent with this opinion within ninety days. 1 We do not consider Parker’s argument regarding the Reenders’ standing to appeal the decision of the zoning board because it was not included in the order granting leave to appeal and it was first raised in Parker’s brief on appeal. 2 To support their due process argument, the Reenders point to precedents from other states, Slagle v Meriden Zoning Bd of Appeals, 144 Conn 690; 137 A2d 542 (1957), and Rousseau v Bldg Inspector of Framingham, 349 Mass 31; 206 NE2d 399 (1965). 1996The zoning board should complete further proceedings consistent with this opinion within ninety days. 1 We do not consider Parker’s argument regarding the Reenders’ standing to appeal the decision of the zoning board because it was not included in the order granting leave to appeal and it was first raised in Parker’s brief on appeal. 2 To support their due process argument, the Reenders point to precedents from other states, Slagle v Meriden Zoning Bd of Appeals, 144 Conn 690; 137 A2d 542 (1957), and Rousseau v Bldg Inspector of Framingham, 349 Mass 31; 206 NE2d 399 (1965). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Rousseau v. Building Inspector of Framingham
green
1 sentence1996The zoning board should complete further proceedings consistent with this opinion within ninety days. 1 We do not consider Parker’s argument regarding the Reenders’ standing to appeal the decision of the zoning board because it was not included in the order granting leave to appeal and it was first raised in Parker’s brief on appeal. 2 To support their due process argument, the Reenders point to precedents from other states, Slagle v Meriden Zoning Bd of Appeals, 144 Conn 690; 137 A2d 542 (1957), and Rousseau v Bldg Inspector of Framingham, 349 Mass 31; 206 NE2d 399 (1965). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Hardigree v. Green
neutral
2 sentences1993See also, e.g., Grant v Cottage Hosp Corp, 368 Mich 77, 78; 117 NW2d 90 (1962); Browning v Paddock, 364 Mich 293, 297 ; 111 NW2d 45 (1961); Hardigree v Green, 97 Mich App 62, 65-66 ; 293 NW2d 719 (1980), rev’d on other grounds 409 Mich 913 (1980). 1993See also, e.g., Grant v Cottage Hosp Corp, 368 Mich 77, 78; 117 NW2d 90 (1962); Browning v Paddock, 364 Mich 293, 297 ; 111 NW2d 45 (1961); Hardigree v Green, 97 Mich App 62, 65-66 ; 293 NW2d 719 (1980), rev’d on other grounds 409 Mich 913 (1980). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Browning v. Paddock
green
2 sentences1993See also, e.g., Grant v Cottage Hosp Corp, 368 Mich 77, 78; 117 NW2d 90 (1962); Browning v Paddock, 364 Mich 293, 297 ; 111 NW2d 45 (1961); Hardigree v Green, 97 Mich App 62, 65-66 ; 293 NW2d 719 (1980), rev’d on other grounds 409 Mich 913 (1980). 1993See also, e.g., Grant v Cottage Hosp Corp, 368 Mich 77, 78; 117 NW2d 90 (1962); Browning v Paddock, 364 Mich 293, 297 ; 111 NW2d 45 (1961); Hardigree v Green, 97 Mich App 62, 65-66 ; 293 NW2d 719 (1980), rev’d on other grounds 409 Mich 913 (1980). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
People v. Turner
green
2 sentences1981People v Turner, 390 Mich 7, 19 ; 210 NW2d 336 (1973), quoting United States v Chisum, 312 F Supp 1307, 1312 (CD Cal, 1970). [2] In Brady and Parker defendants pled guilty to avoid the possibility of a death sentence that could, according to statute, only be imposed after a jury trial. 1981People v Turner, 390 Mich 7, 19 ; 210 NW2d 336 (1973), quoting United States v Chisum, 312 F Supp 1307, 1312 (CD Cal, 1970). [2] In Brady and Parker defendants pled guilty to avoid the possibility of a death sentence that could, according to statute, only be imposed after a jury trial. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.