Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1993–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Braxton v. Stewartgreen2 sentences2011Because Parker has not presented any argument regarding intervention as of right under Rule 24(a), we will review the propriety of the trial court’s denial of Parker’s motion to intervene only insofar as the motion seeks permission to intervene under Rule 24(b). 4 See Tucker v. Cull-man-Jefferson Counties Gas Dist., 864 So.2d 317, 319 (Ala.2003) (‘“An appeals court will consider only those issues properly delineated as such, and no matter will be considered on appeal unless presented and argued in brief.’ ” (quoting Braxton v. Stewart, 539 So.2d 284, 286 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988), citing Ex parte Ri 2011Because Parker has not presented any argument regarding intervention as of right under Rule 24(a), we will review the propriety of the trial court’s denial of Parker’s motion to intervene only insofar as the motion seeks permission to intervene under Rule 24(b). 4 See Tucker v. Cull-man-Jefferson Counties Gas Dist., 864 So.2d 317, 319 (Ala.2003) (‘“An appeals court will consider only those issues properly delineated as such, and no matter will be considered on appeal unless presented and argued in brief.’ ” (quoting Braxton v. Stewart, 539 So.2d 284, 286 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988), citing Ex parte Ri | 1 | 1 |
Gotlieb v. Collatgreen1 sentence2011See generally Gotlieb v. Collat, 567 So.2d 1302, 1304 (Ala. 1990) (“[T]his Court is limited to a review of the record alone, and the record cannot be changed, altered, or varied on appeal by statements in briefs of counsel.... | 1 | 1 |
Tucker v. Cullman-Jefferson Counties Gas Dist.green2 sentences2011Because Parker has not presented any argument regarding intervention as of right under Rule 24(a), we will review the propriety of the trial court’s denial of Parker’s motion to intervene only insofar as the motion seeks permission to intervene under Rule 24(b). 4 See Tucker v. Cull-man-Jefferson Counties Gas Dist., 864 So.2d 317, 319 (Ala.2003) (‘“An appeals court will consider only those issues properly delineated as such, and no matter will be considered on appeal unless presented and argued in brief.’ ” (quoting Braxton v. Stewart, 539 So.2d 284, 286 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988), citing Ex parte Ri 2011Because Parker has not presented any argument regarding intervention as of right under Rule 24(a), we will review the propriety of the trial court’s denial of Parker’s motion to intervene only insofar as the motion seeks permission to intervene under Rule 24(b). 4 See Tucker v. Cull-man-Jefferson Counties Gas Dist., 864 So.2d 317, 319 (Ala.2003) (‘“An appeals court will consider only those issues properly delineated as such, and no matter will be considered on appeal unless presented and argued in brief.’ ” (quoting Braxton v. Stewart, 539 So.2d 284, 286 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988), citing Ex parte Ri | 1 | 1 |
Andrus v. Lambertgreen2 sentences2001"As this court stated in Andrus v. Lambert , 424 So.2d 5 , 9 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982): "`The right to a parole is a privilege granted by the people of Alabama to those committed to our penal institutions as punishment for crimes. 2001“As this court stated in Andrus v. Lambert, 424 So.2d 5, 9 (Ala.Cr.App.1982): “ ‘The right to a parole is a privilege granted by the people of Alabama to those committed to our penal institutions as punishment for crimes. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bechtel v. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp.
green
1 sentence2017Petroleum Corp. , 451 So.2d 793 , 795 (Ala. 1984) (observing that the appellant "states that estoppel was raised in oral argument at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Jim Parker Building Co. v. G & S Glass & Supply Co.
green
1 sentence2017Co. v. G & S Glass & Supply Co. , 69 So.3d 124 , 134 (Ala. 2011) (noting that "because the hearing in this case was not transcribed, nothing presented at that hearing may form the basis for reversing the trial court's denial of Parker's motion to compel arbitration"); Bechtel v. Crown Cent. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Qbe Ins. Corp. v. Austin Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence2011In QBE Insurance Corp. v. Austin Co., 23 So.3d 1127 (Ala.2009), this Court explained the field of operation for Rule 24(b): “Rule 24(b), Ala. R. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Ex Parte Riley
green
2 sentences2011Because Parker has not presented any argument regarding intervention as of right under Rule 24(a), we will review the propriety of the trial court’s denial of Parker’s motion to intervene only insofar as the motion seeks permission to intervene under Rule 24(b). 4 See Tucker v. Cull-man-Jefferson Counties Gas Dist., 864 So.2d 317, 319 (Ala.2003) (‘“An appeals court will consider only those issues properly delineated as such, and no matter will be considered on appeal unless presented and argued in brief.’ ” (quoting Braxton v. Stewart, 539 So.2d 284, 286 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988), citing Ex parte Ri 2011Because Parker has not presented any argument regarding intervention as of right under Rule 24(a), we will review the propriety of the trial court’s denial of Parker’s motion to intervene only insofar as the motion seeks permission to intervene under Rule 24(b). 4 See Tucker v. Cull-man-Jefferson Counties Gas Dist., 864 So.2d 317, 319 (Ala.2003) (‘“An appeals court will consider only those issues properly delineated as such, and no matter will be considered on appeal unless presented and argued in brief.’ ” (quoting Braxton v. Stewart, 539 So.2d 284, 286 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988), citing Ex parte Ri | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Spencer v. Texas
green
2 sentences1997As to Parker's claim that the statute is unconstitutional as it violates his right to due process, the United States Supreme Court, in Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554 , 87 S.Ct. 648 , 17 L.Ed.2d 606 (1967), addressed a Texas statutory procedure whereby Texas enforced its habitual offender statute by alleging the prior offenses in the indictment and introducing proof of these past convictions. 1997As to Parker's claim that the statute is unconstitutional as it violates his right to due process, the United States Supreme Court, in Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554 , 87 S.Ct. 648 , 17 L.Ed.2d 606 (1967), addressed a Texas statutory procedure whereby Texas enforced its habitual offender statute by alleging the prior offenses in the indictment and introducing proof of these past convictions. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
green
2 sentences1993According to Pate, therefore, the 1986 ordinance, enacted by the City under a stricter enabling statute, is not an "authorized implementation of state policy," City of Columbia , 499 U.S. at ___ , 111 S.Ct. at 1349 , and, consequently, the City's prohibition of new off-site billboards should not have been afforded Parker immunity. 1993According to Pate, therefore, the 1986 ordinance, enacted by the City under a stricter enabling statute, is not an "authorized implementation of state policy," City of Columbia , 499 U.S. at ___ , 111 S.Ct. at 1349 , and, consequently, the City's prohibition of new off-site billboards should not have been afforded Parker immunity. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.