Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.green2 sentences2016Peterson v. Bendix Home Sys., Inc., 318 N.W.2d 50, 52-53 (Minn. 1982). 2015Peterson v. Bendix Home Sys., Inc., 318 N.W.2d 50, 52-53 (Minn.1982). | 4 | 4 |
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.green1 sentence2010The parties agree, and we will assume for *327 purposes of this appeal, that this case involves warranties of future performance. 7 A. We held in Vlahos v. R & I Construction of Bloomington, Inc., that the statute of limitations for a breach-of-warranty claim “begins to run when the homeowner discovers, or should have discovered, the builder’s refusal or inability to ensure the home is free from major constructions defects.” 676 N.W.2d 672, 678 (Minn.2004). | 1 | 1 |
Hapka v. Paquin Farmsgreen1 sentence1994In like fashion, respondent takes out of context the general statement in Hapka v. Paquin Farms, 458 N.W.2d 683, 688 (Minn.1990), that the U.C.C. was intended to displace common law claims and to provide “a complete and independent statutory scheme enacted for the governance of all commercial transactions.” Within the parameters of the economic loss rule, the U.C.C., of course, is exclusive, but appellant consulting engineer, not a party to the sale of the component parts, is outside these parameters. 7 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Osborn v. Will
green
2 sentences2017Ride Auto relies on Osborn v. Will for the proposition that fraud voids the contract and prevents Sorchaga from recovering on a breach-of-warranty claim. 183 Minn. 205 , 236 N.W. 197 (1931). 2017Ride Auto relies on Osborn v. Will for the proposition that fraud voids the contract and prevents Sorchaga from recovering on a breach-of-warranty claim. 183 Minn. 205 , 236 N.W. 197 (1931). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros.
green
1 sentence1988Valley Farmers, 398 N.W.2d at 556-557 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.
green
2 sentences1969Co. 123 Minn. 17 , 142 N. W. 930, 1136 , L.R.A. 1915B, 1179 , did not involve a breach of warranty claim but instead a claim that defendants wrongfully and maliciously interfered with the business of plaintiff by misrepresentation, threats of litigation, and the malicious prosecution of two patent infringement suits. 1969Co. 123 Minn. 17 , 142 N. W. 930, 1136 , L.R.A. 1915B, 1179 , did not involve a breach of warranty claim but instead a claim that defendants wrongfully and maliciously interfered with the business of plaintiff by misrepresentation, threats of litigation, and the malicious prosecution of two patent infringement suits. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.