excusable neglect standard (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

excusable neglect standard in Mississippi

9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Black v. Carey Canada, Inc.green
mssd · 1990 · cited in 3 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2001–2006
2 sentences

2006Id. at 136 (quoting Black v. Carey Canada, Inc. 791 F.Supp. 1120,1127 (S.D.Miss.1990)).

2006Id. at 136 (quoting Black v. Carey Canada, Inc. 791 F.Supp. 1120,1127 (S.D.Miss.1990)).

23
David Glen Nunnery v. Paul Edward Nunnerygreen
miss · 2016 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018Nunnery , 195 So.3d at 752 (¶ 15).

2018See Nunnery v. Nunnery , 195 So.3d 747 , 752 (¶ 15) (Miss. 2016). ¶ 10.

22
Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. Partnershipgreen
scotus · 1993 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Partnership, 507 U.S. 380, 385 (1993).

11
Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Boydgreen
missctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008"This excusable neglect standard is a very strict standard." Moore v. Boyd, 799 So.2d 133, 136 (¶ 7) (Miss.Ct.App.2001).

11
Holmes v. Coast Transit Authoritygreen
miss · 2002 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007"The excusable neglect standard is a very strict standard." Holmes v. Coast Transit Auth., 815 So.2d 1183, 1186 (¶ 16) (Miss.2002). ¶ 21.

11
Parke-Chapley Construction Company, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff v. Thomas F. Cherringtongreen
ca7 · 1989 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005See, e.g., Parke-Chapley Constr. v. Cherrington, 865 F.2d 907, 911 (7th Cir.1989). ¶ 9.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

VT 18 (1989–2026) ME 15 (1982–2023) UT 12 (1996–2023) CO 11 (1991–2024) MS 9 (2001–2019) FL 8 (2002–2024) RI 8 (1995–2024) WI 8 (1982–2023) OH 6 (2005–2021) KS 5 (2000–2026) NJ 5 (2000–2026) VI 5 (2000–2025) AZ 5 (2001–2020) MA 5 (1993–2025) MT 4 (1994–2008) HI 3 (1996–2011) NM 3 (2002–2024) NV 2 (2025–2025) DC 2 (2012–2015) TN 2 (2010–2012) IN 2 (1981–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check