Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See, e.g., Wilson v. State, 197 Miss. 17, 20 , 19 So.2d 475 (1944) ("Ordinarily, [a] verdict is sufficient in form if it expresses the intent of the jury so that the court can understand it."). *1004 C. 2001See, e.g., Wilson v. State, 197 Miss. 17, 20 , 19 So.2d 475 (1944) ("Ordinarily, [a] verdict is sufficient in form if it expresses the intent of the jury so that the court can understand it."). *1004 C. | 2 | 2 |
Owens v. Stategreen2 sentences2015As we said in Owens v. State, when, based on the defendant’s claimed location, “it would remain within the realm of physical possibility for the defendant to have committed the crime, then the defense is nothing more than a denial and would not rise to the level of alibi.” Owens, 809 So. 2d 744, 747 (¶7) (Miss. 2015As we said in Owens v. State, when, based on the defendant’s claimed location, “it would remain within the realm of physical possibility for the defendant to have committed the crime, then the defense is nothing more than a denial and would not rise to the level of alibi.” Owens v. State, 809 So.2d 744, 747 (¶ 7) (Miss.Ct.App.2002). | 1 | 1 |
Wesson v. Fred's Inc.green2 sentences2005Wesson v. Fred's Inc., 811 So.2d 464, 471 (¶ 35) (Miss.Ct.App.2002) (emphasis added). 2005Wesson v. Fred's Inc., 811 So.2d 464, 471 (¶ 35) (Miss.Ct.App.2002) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Wells-Lamont Corp.green1 sentence2002Thompson v. Wells-Lamont Corp., 362 So.2d 638, 640 (Miss. 1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Betty Lou Beets v. Wayne Scott, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
green
2 sentences2018And, in Beets v. Scott , 65 F.3d 1258 , 1265-66 (5th Cir. 1995), an en banc decision of the Fifth Circuit had limited Cuyler to cases involving multiple representation. 2018And, in Beets v. Scott , 65 F.3d 1258 , 1265-66 (5th Cir. 1995), an en banc decision of the Fifth Circuit had limited Cuyler to cases involving multiple representation. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Jordan v. State
green
2 sentences2016“A fair reading of the verdict convinces us that the jury’s decision is unambiguous and Jordan’s claim is without merit.” Id. 2015“A fair reading of the verdict convinces us that the jury’s decision is unambiguous and Jordan’s claim is without merit.” Id. | 2 | 2015–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.