Jordan challenge in Washington

2012Id. at 570 , 112 P. 656 .

2012Id. at 570, 112 P. 656 .

2020App. 43, 46 , 78 P.3d 660 (2003). 3 No. 80689-1-I/4 reviewed novo.”6 “Washington superior courts have general jurisdiction, they lack subject matter jurisdiction only ‘under compelling circumstances, such as when it is explicitly limited by the Legislature or Congress.’”7 When more than one state is involved in a child support proceeding, UIFSA applies and controls the determination of subject matter jurisdiction.8 Whitted relies on Scanlon v. Witrak.9 In Scanlon, the father appealed the court’s denial of his CR 60(b) motion to vacate.

2020He contends the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear Jordan’s motion for contempt because Jordan “failed to properly register the Georgia child support decree in Washington as required by the UIFSA.”4 We review a court’s decision on a CR 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion.5 However, “[w]hether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law 4 Appellant’s Br. at 15. 5 Barr v. MacGugan, 119 Wn.

2019However, if a parent is unwilling or unable to 6 "Substantial evidence exists if the record contains evidence of sufficient quantity to persuade a fair-minded, rational person of the truth of the declared premise." Bering v. SHARE, 106 Wn.2d 212, 220 , 721 P.2d 918 (1986)(citing In re Snyder, 85 Wn.2d 182, 185-86 , 532 P.2d 278 (1975)). 7 This issue encompasses Jordan's challenge to findings of fact 2.14, 2.15, 2.17, and 2.31. -6 - No. 79125-7-1/7 make use of available services, the Department is not obligated to offer other services.

2019However, if a parent is unwilling or unable to 6 "Substantial evidence exists if the record contains evidence of sufficient quantity to persuade a fair-minded, rational person of the truth of the declared premise." Bering v. SHARE, 106 Wn.2d 212, 220 , 721 P.2d 918 (1986)(citing In re Snyder, 85 Wn.2d 182, 185-86 , 532 P.2d 278 (1975)). 7 This issue encompasses Jordan's challenge to findings of fact 2.14, 2.15, 2.17, and 2.31. -6 - No. 79125-7-1/7 make use of available services, the Department is not obligated to offer other services.

2019In re Dependency of Ramquist, 52 Wn.

2019However, if a parent is unwilling or unable to 6 "Substantial evidence exists if the record contains evidence of sufficient quantity to persuade a fair-minded, rational person of the truth of the declared premise." Bering v. SHARE, 106 Wn.2d 212, 220 , 721 P.2d 918 (1986)(citing In re Snyder, 85 Wn.2d 182, 185-86 , 532 P.2d 278 (1975)). 7 This issue encompasses Jordan's challenge to findings of fact 2.14, 2.15, 2.17, and 2.31. -6 - No. 79125-7-1/7 make use of available services, the Department is not obligated to offer other services.

2019However, if a parent is unwilling or unable to 6 "Substantial evidence exists if the record contains evidence of sufficient quantity to persuade a fair-minded, rational person of the truth of the declared premise." Bering v. SHARE, 106 Wn.2d 212, 220 , 721 P.2d 918 (1986)(citing In re Snyder, 85 Wn.2d 182, 185-86 , 532 P.2d 278 (1975)). 7 This issue encompasses Jordan's challenge to findings of fact 2.14, 2.15, 2.17, and 2.31. -6 - No. 79125-7-1/7 make use of available services, the Department is not obligated to offer other services.

2019App. 181, 204 , 108 P.3d 156 (2005). 13 This argument encompasses Jordan's challenge to findings of fact 2.18, 2.20, 2.24, 2.26, 2.30, and 2.34.

2019In re Dependency of E.L.F., 117 Wn.

2014Id.

2014App. 197, 217-18 , 81 P.3d 122 (2003), review denied, 151 Wn.2d 1032 (2004), the trial court concluded that the letters were admissible under ER 404(b).

2014App. 197, 217-18 , 81 P.3d 122 (2003), review denied, 151 Wn.2d 1032 (2004), the trial court concluded that the letters were admissible under ER 404(b).

2014When ruling on Jordan's objection, the court noted that "a jury might look at" the letters "and say this is a letter written by somebody who knew he was guilty, which they're permitted to do." Based on that interpretation of the letters Jordan wrote to his father and our opinion in State v. Moran. 119 Wn.

1973App. 408, 409 , 481 P.2d 582 (1971), it is held that “one may not successfully claim property under color of title when the property is not described in the deed.” Since none of the conveyances in Jordan’s chain of title purport to convey the strip in question, Jordan’s claim is not “under color of title” and the statute is inapplicable.