Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2019"The scope of the State's opening statement is limited to the 'facts [it] intends in A-0429-17T3 10 good faith to prove by competent evidence.'" State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 442 (2007) (quoting State v. Hipplewith, 33 N.J. 300, 309 (1960)). "[T]he test for determining whether prosecutorial misconduct constitutes reversible error is whether the misconduct 'was so egregious that it deprived defendant of a fair trial.'" The goal that rule seeks to foster is that "juries [will] . . . reach a verdict and impose a penalty without inordinate exposure to unduly prejudicial, inflammatory commentar 2019"The scope of the State's opening statement is limited to the 'facts [it] intends in A-0429-17T3 10 good faith to prove by competent evidence.'" State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 442 (2007) (quoting State v. Hipplewith, 33 N.J. 300, 309 (1960)). "[T]he test for determining whether prosecutorial misconduct constitutes reversible error is whether the misconduct 'was so egregious that it deprived defendant of a fair trial.'" The goal that rule seeks to foster is that "juries [will] . . . reach a verdict and impose a penalty without inordinate exposure to unduly prejudicial, inflammatory commentar | 1 | 2 |
State v. DiFriscogreen2 sentences2019"The scope of the State's opening statement is limited to the 'facts [it] intends in A-0429-17T3 10 good faith to prove by competent evidence.'" State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 442 (2007) (quoting State v. Hipplewith, 33 N.J. 300, 309 (1960)). "[T]he test for determining whether prosecutorial misconduct constitutes reversible error is whether the misconduct 'was so egregious that it deprived defendant of a fair trial.'" The goal that rule seeks to foster is that "juries [will] . . . reach a verdict and impose a penalty without inordinate exposure to unduly prejudicial, inflammatory commentar 2007The goal that rule seeks to foster is that juries [will] . . . reach a verdict and impose a penalty without inordinate exposure to unduly prejudicial, inflammatory commentary. *982 Although we impose a greater burden on prosecuting attorneys than defense attorneys on that issue, [i]t is well-established that prosecuting attorneys, within reasonable limitations, are afforded considerable leeway in making opening statements and summations. [ State v. DiFrisco (II), 137 N.J. 434, 474 , 645 A. 2d 734 (1994) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).] So informed, we address defendant's cont | 1 | 2 |
Faretta v. Californiagreen1 sentence2021The goal of this inquiry "is not to ascertain whether a defendant possesses technical legal knowledge," but rather to "apprise the defendant 'of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.'" Outland, 245 N.J. at 506 (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835 (1975)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jimenezgreen1 sentence2019"The scope of the State's opening statement is limited to the 'facts [it] intends in A-0429-17T3 10 good faith to prove by competent evidence.'" State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 442 (2007) (quoting State v. Hipplewith, 33 N.J. 300, 309 (1960)). "[T]he test for determining whether prosecutorial misconduct constitutes reversible error is whether the misconduct 'was so egregious that it deprived defendant of a fair trial.'" The goal that rule seeks to foster is that "juries [will] . . . reach a verdict and impose a penalty without inordinate exposure to unduly prejudicial, inflammatory commentar | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hipplewithgreen1 sentence2019"The scope of the State's opening statement is limited to the 'facts [it] intends in A-0429-17T3 10 good faith to prove by competent evidence.'" State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 442 (2007) (quoting State v. Hipplewith, 33 N.J. 300, 309 (1960)). "[T]he test for determining whether prosecutorial misconduct constitutes reversible error is whether the misconduct 'was so egregious that it deprived defendant of a fair trial.'" The goal that rule seeks to foster is that "juries [will] . . . reach a verdict and impose a penalty without inordinate exposure to unduly prejudicial, inflammatory commentar | 1 | 1 |
State v. Penningtongreen1 sentence2019"The scope of the State's opening statement is limited to the 'facts [it] intends in A-0429-17T3 10 good faith to prove by competent evidence.'" State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 442 (2007) (quoting State v. Hipplewith, 33 N.J. 300, 309 (1960)). "[T]he test for determining whether prosecutorial misconduct constitutes reversible error is whether the misconduct 'was so egregious that it deprived defendant of a fair trial.'" The goal that rule seeks to foster is that "juries [will] . . . reach a verdict and impose a penalty without inordinate exposure to unduly prejudicial, inflammatory commentar | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
A & M FARM v. Am. Sprinkler Mech.
green
1 sentence2026Nonetheless, the action required "is a matter within the discretion of the motion judge, giving due consideration to the circumstances of the case and the goal of the rule to compel discovery responses." Id. at 538 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Crisafi
green
1 sentence2021The judge should "specifically advise the defendants that it would be unwise not to accept the A-4499-18 15 assistance of counsel." Crisafi, 128 N.J. at 512 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Waste Management, Inc. v. Admiral Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2017The goal of that requirement is to ensure predictability and to shield parties from being "haled into court in a foreign jurisdiction solely on the basis of random, fortuitous, or attenuated contacts or as a result of the unilateral activity of some other party." Waste Mgmt., supra, 138 N.J. at 121 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Best v. C&M Door Controls, Inc.
green
1 sentence2013Ibid. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In Re the Estate of Stockdale
green
2 sentences2011However, that principle must be understood in light of the goal of the doctrine: the avoidance of "relitigation of a previously resolved issue." Stockdale, supra, 196 N.J. at 311 , 953 A. 2d 454 . 2011However, that principle must be understood in light of the goal of the doctrine: the avoidance of "relitigation of a previously resolved issue." Stockdale, supra, 196 N.J. at 311 , 953 A. 2d 454 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Biegenwald
green
2 sentences1994Although we impose a greater burden on prosecuting attorneys than defense attorneys on that issue, see State v. Biegenwald, 106 N.J. 13, 40 , 524 A.2d 130 (1987) (stating that “prosecutors in capital cases have a special obligation to seek justice and to not simply convict, and ... we will scrupulously review conduct that falls short of this high standard”), “[i]t is well-established that prosecuting attorneys, within reasonable limitations, are afforded considerable leeway in making opening statements and summations.” Williams, supra, 113 N.J. at 447 , 550 A.2d 1172 . 1994Although we impose a greater burden on prosecuting attorneys than defense attorneys on that issue, see State v. Biegenwald, 106 N.J. 13, 40 , 524 A.2d 130 (1987) (stating that “prosecutors in capital cases have a special obligation to seek justice and to not simply convict, and ... we will scrupulously review conduct that falls short of this high standard”), “[i]t is well-established that prosecuting attorneys, within reasonable limitations, are afforded considerable leeway in making opening statements and summations.” Williams, supra, 113 N.J. at 447 , 550 A.2d 1172 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.
green
2 sentences1992The goal of warnings is that "the risk from the product be reduced to the greatest extent possible without hindering its utility." Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 90 N.J. 191, 201 , 447 A. 2d 539 (1982). 1992The goal of warnings is that "the risk from the product be reduced to the greatest extent possible without hindering its utility." Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 90 N.J. 191, 201 , 447 A. 2d 539 (1982). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.