9 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McQuaidgreen2 sentences2025By its subsection (a)(2), [Rule] 3:22-12 allows an additional one-year limitation A-1597-23 11 period if the courts recognize a new constitutional right or defendant discovers a previously unknown factual predicate justifying relief from the conviction. [Id. at 398.] In State v. McQuaid, 147 N.J. 464 (1997), our Supreme Court "emphasized the important policy underlying the requirement that PCR petitions be timely filed": There are good reasons for [Rule 3:22-12]. 2024By its subsection (a)(2), Rule 3:22-12 allows an additional one-year limitation period if the courts recognize a new constitutional right or defendant discovers a previously unknown factual predicate justifying relief from the conviction. [Id. at 398.] In State v. McQuaid, 147 N.J. 464, 485 (1997), our Supreme Court "emphasized the important policy underlying the requirement that PCR petitions be timely filed": There are good reasons for [Rule 3:22-12]. | 2 | 3 |
Teamsters Local 312 v. Matlack, Inc.green2 sentences2006Hosp., 186 F.3d 326 (3d Cir.1999); see also Matlack, supra, 118 F.3d at 991 (noting that "arbitrators, unlike judges, are not institutionally sheltered from `the potential evil of outside communication' and are thus particularly susceptible to various ex parte influences."). 2006Hosp., 186 F.3d 326 (3d Cir.1999); see also Matlack, supra, 118 F.3d at 991 (noting that "arbitrators, unlike judges, are not institutionally sheltered from `the potential evil of outside communication' and are thus particularly susceptible to various ex parte influences."). | 1 | 1 |
McQuillan v. Clark Thread Co.green2 sentences1998It [i]s the buyer who [i]s now in control and accordingly it [i]s his obligation to remedy the condition.” Id. at 408 , 456 A.2d 524 ; see also McQuillan v. Clark Thread Co., 12 N.J. 1998It [i]s the buyer who [i]s now in control and accordingly it [i]s his obligation to remedy the condition." Id. at 408 , 456 A. 2d 524 ; see also McQuillan v. Clark Thread Co., 12 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Atkinsongreen2 sentences1979The policy underlying this rule is that once a defendant is on trial, he "is entitled to have the question of his guilt determined upon the evidence against him, not on whether a Government witness or co-defendant has plead [sic] guilty to the same charge." Babb v. United States, 218 F. 2d. 538, 542 (5 Cir.1955); also United States v. Hall, 178 F. 2d 853 (2 Cir.1950); accord, State v. Atkinson, 25 N.C. 1979App. 575 , 214 S.E. 2d 270 (Ct. App. 1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. St. Venantius School
green
2 sentences2011In Brown, supra, 111 N.J. at 334 , 544 A. 2d 842 , the Court decided that a not-for-profit school was "commercial" property by looking at the policy underlying the rule that a commercial landlord is responsible for maintaining the sidewalk. 2011In Brown, supra, 111 N.J. at 334 , 544 A. 2d 842 , the Court decided that a not-for-profit school was "commercial" property by looking at the policy underlying the rule that a commercial landlord is responsible for maintaining the sidewalk. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Cooper v. Shore Electric Co.
green
2 sentences2006Co., 63 N.J.L. 558, 564 , 44 A. 633 (1899). 2006Co., 63 N.J.L. 558, 564 , 44 A. 633 (1899). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local No. 471 v. Brownsville General Hospital
green
1 sentence2006Hosp., 186 F.3d 326 (3d Cir.1999); see also Matlack, supra, 118 F.3d at 991 (noting that "arbitrators, unlike judges, are not institutionally sheltered from `the potential evil of outside communication' and are thus particularly susceptible to various ex parte influences."). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Cogliati v. Ecco High Frequency Corp.
green
2 sentences1998It [i]s the buyer who [i]s now in control and accordingly it [i]s his obligation to remedy the condition.” Id. at 408 , 456 A.2d 524 ; see also McQuillan v. Clark Thread Co., 12 N.J. 1998It [i]s the buyer who [i]s now in control and accordingly it [i]s his obligation to remedy the condition.” Id. at 408 , 456 A.2d 524 ; see also McQuillan v. Clark Thread Co., 12 N.J. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Bligen v. Jersey City Housing Authority
green
1 sentence1993The second reason for withholding immunity public housing authorities have been held, in other contexts, to the same common-law duties as commercial landlords, see ante at 134-137, 619 A. 2d at 580 -581 deserves but frosty comment: the cold, hard truth is that snow is different, for all the reasons set forth above. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
United States v. Hall
green
2 sentences1979The policy underlying this rule is that once a defendant is on trial, he “is entitled to have the question of his guilt determined upon the evidence against him, not on whether a Government witness or co-defendant has plead [sic] guilty to the same charge.” Babb v. United States, 218 F. 2d. 538, 542 (5 Cir. 1955); also United States v. Hall, 178 F. 2d 853 (2 Cir. 1950); accord, State v. Atkinson, 25 N. C. 1979The policy underlying this rule is that once a defendant is on trial, he "is entitled to have the question of his guilt determined upon the evidence against him, not on whether a Government witness or co-defendant has plead [sic] guilty to the same charge." Babb v. United States, 218 F. 2d. 538, 542 (5 Cir.1955); also United States v. Hall, 178 F. 2d 853 (2 Cir.1950); accord, State v. Atkinson, 25 N.C. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.