Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jordangreen2 sentences2012See State v. Jordan, 116 S.W.3d 8, 18 (Tenn. Crim. 2008See State v. Jordan, 116 S.W.3d 8, 18 (Tenn.Crim.App.2003) (stating that jurors are presumed to follow the instructions given *759 them absent evidence to the contrary). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Inlowgreen1 sentence2025State v. Inlow, 52 S.W.3d 101, 106 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Littlegreen1 sentence2003Furthermore, after Long’s testimony, the trial court gave the jury a limiting instruction restricting the jury’s consideration of Long’s testimony as to the appellant’s intent in counts two and three, specifically instructing the jury to not consider the testimony “as to whether or not there’s any propensity by the defendant to commit the crime.” See State v. Little, 854 S.W.2d 643, 649 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Carpentergreen1 sentence2002After hearing testimony from the victim’s two sisters, Shelton and Fry, in a jury-out hearing, the trial court eventually agreed to -4- allow Shelton to testify that the victim called her from his apartment around midnight a few hours before his death and in response to her question about what was wrong, the victim told her that “Wanda was there.” After Shelton gave this testimony, the trial court gave the jury a limiting instruction, informing the jury that they were to consider Shelton’s statement that the victim told her that “Wanda was there” for the sole purpose of “establish[ing] the def | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Braggs
green
1 sentence2015Braggs, 604 S.W.2d at 885 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2013Thus, based on the entire record, we conclude that the Petitioner has failed to carry his burden of demonstrating that the introduction of a similar offense prejudiced the Petitioner to the extent that it created a “reasonable probability that but for counsel’s error[] the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Vaughn, 202 S.W.3d at 116 (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Vaughn v. State
green
1 sentence2013Thus, based on the entire record, we conclude that the Petitioner has failed to carry his burden of demonstrating that the introduction of a similar offense prejudiced the Petitioner to the extent that it created a “reasonable probability that but for counsel’s error[] the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Vaughn, 202 S.W.3d at 116 (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Bruton v. United States
green
1 sentence1997The petitioner now contends that the admission of Sexton’s confession violated his Confrontation Clause rights under Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.