Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nguyen v. Stategreen1 sentence2025“The procedural safeguards of Anders and its progeny do not apply to retained attorneys and we do not have the same supervisory role in guaranteeing the attorney’s representation.” Nguyen v. State, 11 S.W.3d 376, 379 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Kelly, Sylvestergreen1 sentence2015We will grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of the trial court. 1 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02 (West 2012). 2 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); see Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Anders v. California
green
2 sentences2026PENAL CODE § 43.26(d), (e). 2 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L. 2026PENAL CODE § 43.26(d), (e). 2 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L. | 9 | 2008–2026 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.