Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
May v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See May v. State, 919 S.W.2d 422, 424 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). 2010See May v. State, 919 S.W.2d 422, 424 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). | 2 | 2 |
Egger v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Egger v. State, 62 S.W.3d 221, 224 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, no pet.) (“Absent an affirmative showing to the contrary, a recitation in the trial court's judgment alone is sufficient to show a valid jury waiver.”). | 1 | 1 |
Breazeale v. Stategreen1 sentence2008The Court consented to the waiver of a jury." That recitation is "binding in the absence of direct proof of [its] falsity." Johnson , 72 S.W.3d at 349 (citing Breazeale v. State , 683 S.W.2d 446, 450 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Rogers v. Rogersgreen1 sentence1984Rogers v. Rogers, 561 S.W.2d 172,173 (Tex. 1978). 4 A mere showing that relator was present at the hearing and that he failed to object to the absence of a court reporter is not a showing that he waived his right to a statement of facts and that the court consented to this waiver. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Juarezgreen2 sentences2003But see Ex parte Juarez , 665 S.W.2d 200, 201 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1984, no writ) (stating that "A mere showing that relator was present at the hearing and that he failed to object to the absence of a court reporter is not a showing that he waived his right to a statement of facts and that the court consented to this waiver."). 2003But see Ex parte Juarez, 665 S.W.2d 200, 201 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1984, no writ) (stating that “A mere showing that relator was present at the hearing and that he failed to object to the absence of a court reporter is not a showing that he waived his right to a statement of facts and that the court consented to this waiver.”). | 3 | 4 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Jones
green
2 sentences2023In contrast, other courts of appeals—including at least one court that agreed section 105.003(c) “places an affirmative duty upon the trial court”—have held a party “may waive the making of a record by express written agreement or by failing to object to the lack of a record during the hearing.” In re D.J.M., 114 S.W.3d at 639 ; see also Baker v. Curphy, No. 09-15-00528-CV, 2016 WL 5224753 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Sept. 22, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.); Ex parte Jones, 700 S.W.2d 15 , 16-17 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1985, no writ) (refusing to follow Ex parte Juarez). 2003This possibility of waiver “does not deny a party’s right to a record, but merely prevents one from ‘lying behind the log.’ ” Jones, 700 S.W.2d at 17 . | 4 | 2003–2023 |
Pham v. State
green
1 sentence2008The Court consented to the waiver of a jury." That recitation is "binding in the absence of direct proof of [its] falsity." Johnson , 72 S.W.3d at 349 (citing Breazeale v. State , 683 S.W.2d 446, 450 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.