Crank test (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

Crank test in Texas

9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Wayne C. Holden Corp. v. Verheulgreen
texapp · 1989 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994Id. at 632.

1994Id. at 632.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Villegas v. Carter green
tex · 1986
2 sentences

2005In Villegas v. Carter, 711 S.W.2d 624 (Tex.1986), the Texas Supreme Court expanded the Crank test to include cases where counsel voluntarily withdrew, and the movant did not have time to procure new counsel.

2005In Villegas v. Carter, 711 S.W.2d 624 (Tex.1986), the Texas Supreme Court expanded the Crank test to include cases where counsel voluntarily withdrew, and the movant did not have time to procure new counsel.

51994–2005
State v. Crank green
tex · 1984
2 sentences

2012The supreme court held that the trial court acted within its discretion when it denied Crank’s motion for continuance after he “voluntarily discharged his attorney and reaffirmed the discharge after his requested continuance was denied.” Crank, 666 S.W.2d at 94-95 .

1989The Crank test requires a determination of whether the failure to be represented at trial was “due to the party’s own fault or negligence.” Crank, 666 S.W.2d at 94 .

31989–2022
Landmark Beef Processors, Inc. v. Block green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2005Id. at 95 .

2005Id. at 95 .

31994–2005
Lewis v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'n green
tex · 1977
1 sentence

1983We have also reviewed the case of Lewis v. Metropolitan S & L Ass’n, 550 S.W.2d 11 (Tex.1977), where the question was raised as to whether a denial of due process in the administrative hearing becomes immaterial and beside the point if the order can be said to have reasonable evidentiary support in the administrative record.

11983–1983

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check