Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Maryland v. Kinggreen2 sentences2015See Maryland v. King, __ U.S. __, 133 S. Ct. 1958 , 186 L. 2015See Maryland v. King, __ U.S. __, 133 S. Ct. 1958 , 186 L. | 4 | 4 |
Missouri v. McNeelygreen2 sentences2015See e.g., McNeely, 133 S. Ct. at 1557, n. 1 ; Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 746, n. 6 (1984); Riley v. California, 134 S. Ct. 2473, 2482 (2014). 2014See e.g., McNeely, 133 S.Ct. at 1557, n. 1 ; Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 746, n. 6 , 104 S.Ct. 2091 , 80 L.Ed.2d 732 (1984); Riley v. California, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 2482 (2014). | 2 | 2 |
Riley v. Cal. United Statesgreen2 sentences2015See e.g., McNeely, 133 S. Ct. at 1557, n. 1 ; Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 746, n. 6 (1984); Riley v. California, 134 S. Ct. 2473, 2482 (2014). 2014See e.g., McNeely, 133 S.Ct. at 1557, n. 1 ; Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 746, n. 6 , 104 S.Ct. 2091 , 80 L.Ed.2d 732 (1984); Riley v. California, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 2482 (2014). | 2 | 2 |
Welsh v. Wisconsingreen2 sentences2015See e.g., McNeely, 133 S. Ct. at 1557, n. 1 ; Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 746, n. 6 (1984); Riley v. California, 134 S. Ct. 2473, 2482 (2014). 2014See e.g., McNeely, 133 S.Ct. at 1557, n. 1 ; Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 746, n. 6 , 104 S.Ct. 2091 , 80 L.Ed.2d 732 (1984); Riley v. California, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 2482 (2014). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Villarreal, Davidgreen1 sentence2016See Villarreal, 475 S.W.3d at 807-13 ; Tercero, 467 S.W.3d at 8 . c. | 1 | 1 |
California v. Acevedogreen1 sentence2015Fourth Amendment analysis of warrantless searches rests heavily on a simple notion: “It remains a cardinal principle that searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment - subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.” California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565, 580 (1991).2 These exceptions have been established by engaging in a balancing test in which legitimate government interests are weighed against the individual’s expectation of privacy. | 1 | 1 |
Schenekl v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Schenekl v. State, 30 S.W.3d 412, 413 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Allen Tercero
green
2 sentences2016See Villarreal, 475 S.W.3d at 807-13 ; Tercero, 467 S.W.3d at 8 . c. 2015Tercero, 2015 WL 1544519 at *6 . | 2 | 2015–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.