Fourth Amendment balancing test (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

Fourth Amendment balancing test in Illinois

6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Taylorgreen
ill · 2006 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008She maintains that “the fourth amendment balancing test employed in Garvin involves different considerations when applied in the juvenile context” and urges this court to hold our indexing statute constitutionally unreasonable because it treats adjudicated minors the same as adult felons. -7- First, relying on People v. Taylor, 221 Ill. 2d 157, 168-69 (2006), Lakisha argues that a delinquency adjudication is not the equivalent of a criminal felony conviction and, for that reason, delinquent minors do not have the same diminished expectation of privacy as convicted felons.

2008First, relying on People v. Taylor, 221 Ill. 2d 157, 168-69 (2006), Lakisha argues that a delinquency adjudication is not the equivalent of a criminal felony conviction and, for that reason, delinquent minors do not have the same diminished expectation of privacy as convicted felons.

22
United States v. Knightsgreen
scotus · 2001 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004See United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 118-19 , 151 L.

2004See United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 118-19 , 151 L.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Thomas Cameron Kincade green
ca9 · 2004
2 sentences

2004Based in large part on Knights , the Kincade court held that utilization of a traditional fourth amendment balancing test to uphold genetic marker testing of convicted offenders "both comports with the Supreme Court's recent precedents and resolves this appeal in concert with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment." Kincade, 379 F.3d at 832 .

2004Based in large part on Knights, the Kincade court held that utilization of a traditional fourth amendment balancing test to uphold genetic marker testing of convicted offenders “both comports with the Supreme Court’s recent precedents and resolves this appeal in concert with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment.” Kincade, 379 F.3d at 832 .

22004–2004

Where else courts name it

TX 9 (2014–2016) NC 9 (2019–2020) IL 6 (2004–2008) OH 4 (2002–2014) MD 2 (1988–2012) KY 2 (2010–2023) NH 2 (1984–1985) ID 2 (2022–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check