Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carter v. Stategreen2 sentences2004Carter v. State , 614 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981). 2000Carter v. State , 614 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981). | 4 | 4 |
Waldo v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See id. 2009See id. | 2 | 2 |
Nethery v. Stategreen2 sentences1991Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 703 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 897 , 88 L.Ed.2d 931 (no reversible error where prosecutor’s argument responds to defense argument regarding motive). 14 Nevertheless, the State also contends there was no reversible error because the trial judge's instructions to the jury cured any error and, further, that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 1991Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 703 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 897 , 88 L.Ed.2d 931 (no reversible error where prosecutor's argument responds to defense argument regarding motive). [14] Nevertheless, the State also contends there was no reversible error because the trial judge's instructions to the jury cured any error and, further, that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 1 |
Pointer v. Stategreen1 sentence1971See Pointer v. State, 467 S.W.2d 426 (Tex.Crim.App.1971); Doby v. State, 454 S.W.2d 411 (Tex.Crim.App.1970) and Thomas v. State, 468 S.W.2d 418 (Tex.Crim.App.1971). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cannon v. Texas
green
2 sentences1991Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 703 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 897 , 88 L.Ed.2d 931 (no reversible error where prosecutor’s argument responds to defense argument regarding motive). 14 Nevertheless, the State also contends there was no reversible error because the trial judge's instructions to the jury cured any error and, further, that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 1991Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 703 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 897 , 88 L.Ed.2d 931 (no reversible error where prosecutor's argument responds to defense argument regarding motive). [14] Nevertheless, the State also contends there was no reversible error because the trial judge's instructions to the jury cured any error and, further, that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Thomas v. State
neutral
1 sentence1971See Pointer v. State, 467 S.W.2d 426 (Tex.Crim.App.1971); Doby v. State, 454 S.W.2d 411 (Tex.Crim.App.1970) and Thomas v. State, 468 S.W.2d 418 (Tex.Crim.App.1971). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
White v. State
green
1 sentence1971The rule, as stated in White v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 444 S.W.2d 921 , is: “An error in asking an improper question or in admitting improper testimony may be generally cured or rendered harmless by a withdrawal of such testimony and an instruction to disregard the same except in extreme cases where it appears that the question or evidence is clearly calculated to inflame the minds of the jury and is of such character as to suggest the impossibility of withdrawing the impression produced on their minds.” The question and answer here is not that type of “extreme case,” and appellant received adequ | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Doby v. State
green
1 sentence1971See Pointer v. State, 467 S.W.2d 426 (Tex.Crim.App.1971); Doby v. State, 454 S.W.2d 411 (Tex.Crim.App.1970) and Thomas v. State, 468 S.W.2d 418 (Tex.Crim.App.1971). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.