Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holley v. Adamsgreen2 sentences2021In re E.N.C., 384 S.W.3d 796, 807 (Tex. 2012) (citing Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 , 371– 72 (Tex. 1976)). 2019See Holley, 544 S.W.2d at 371–72. | 4 | 8 |
In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G. and C.G.L.green1 sentence2021In re E.N.C., 384 S.W.3d 796, 807 (Tex. 2012) (citing Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 , 371– 72 (Tex. 1976)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re CH
green
2 sentences2014Code Ann. § 161.001 (2) (West 2014); J.P.B., 180 S.W.3d at 573–74; C.H., 89 S.W.3d at 27 ; Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 , 371–72 (Tex. 1976). 13 See Tex. Fam. 2013Code Ann. § 161.001 (2) (West Supp. 2013); J.P.B., 180 S.W.3d at 573–74; C.H., 89 S.W.3d at 27 ; Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 , 371–72 (Tex. 1976). 23 best interest, and we therefore hold that the evidence is factually sufficient to support the best interest finding. 17 We overrule the parents’ fourth issue. | 2 | 2013–2014 |
In Re JPB
green
2 sentences2014Code Ann. § 161.001 (2) (West 2014); J.P.B., 180 S.W.3d at 573–74; C.H., 89 S.W.3d at 27 ; Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 , 371–72 (Tex. 1976). 13 See Tex. Fam. 2013Code Ann. § 161.001 (2) (West Supp. 2013); J.P.B., 180 S.W.3d at 573–74; C.H., 89 S.W.3d at 27 ; Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 , 371–72 (Tex. 1976). 23 best interest, and we therefore hold that the evidence is factually sufficient to support the best interest finding. 17 We overrule the parents’ fourth issue. | 2 | 2013–2014 |
in the Interest of B.R., Children
green
1 sentence2019In the Interest of B.R., 456 S.W.3d 612 , 615–16 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015, no pet.) (quoting Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 , 371–72 (Tex. 1976)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
in the Interest of K.S., a Child
green
1 sentence2015Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 371-72 (Tex.1976); KS., 420 S.W.3d at 855 . 1. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re JFC
green
1 sentence2014In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d at 266 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.