Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
STATE, ETC. v. Santiagogreen2 sentences2018As our supreme court explained in Hoopiiaina , "a true quiet title action is a suit brought to quiet an existing title against an adverse or hostile claim of another, and the effect of a decree quieting title is not to vest title but rather is to perfect an existing title as against other claimants." 2006 UT 53 , ¶ 26, 144 P.3d 1129 (quotation simplified); see also Department of Social Services v. Santiago , 590 P.2d 335 , 337 (Utah 1979) ("[A] quiet title action, as its name connotes, is one to quiet an existing title against an adverse or hostile claim of another."). 2006A true quiet title action is a suit brought “to quiet an existing title against an adverse or hostile claim of another,” and “the effect of a decree quieting title is not to vest title but rather is to perfect an existing title as against other claimants.” Dep’t of Social Servs. v. Santiago, 590 P.2d 335, 337-38 (Utah 1979). | 3 | 4 |
In Re Hoopiiaina Trustgreen2 sentences2023See In re Hoopiiaina Trust, 2006 UT 53, ¶ 27 , 144 P.3d 1129 (“When a party asserts a quiet title claim in which that party merely requests that the court adjudicate the validity of an opponent’s adverse or hostile claim to property to which the party already holds title, no statute of limitations applies.”). 20210568-CA 7 2023 UT App 43 Fernwood Place v. Layton Partners Holdings on a liability created by state statute. 2023See In re Hoopiiaina Trust, 2006 UT 53, ¶ 27 , 144 P.3d 1129 (“When a party asserts a quiet title claim in which that party merely requests that the court adjudicate the validity of an opponent’s adverse or hostile claim to property to which the party already holds title, no statute of limitations applies.”). 20210568-CA 7 2023 UT App 43 Fernwood Place v. Layton Partners Holdings on a liability created by state statute. | 2 | 7 |
Fernwood Place v. Layton Partners Holdingsgreen1 sentence2023See In re Hoopiiaina Trust, 2006 UT 53, ¶ 27 , 144 P.3d 1129 (“When a party asserts a quiet title claim in which that party merely requests that the court adjudicate the validity of an opponent’s adverse or hostile claim to property to which the party already holds title, no statute of limitations applies.”). 20210568-CA 7 2023 UT App 43 Fernwood Place v. Layton Partners Holdings on a liability created by state statute. | 1 | 1 |
The Texas Company v. Davisgreen1 sentence2019We said that “[w]hen a party asserts a quiet title claim in which that party merely requests that the court adjudicate the validity of an opponent’s adverse or hostile claim to property to which the party already holds title,” the party is bringing a true quiet title claim. 59 So “if it is not necessary that the court grant other relief in favor of the 53 Tex. Co. v. Davis, 254 S.W. 304, 309 (Tex. 1923). 54 2006 UT 53 , ¶ 26 (citation omitted). 55 Id. 56 Id. 57 Id. (quoting State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
WDIS v. Hi-Country
green
1 sentence2019Instead, we attempted to create a standard that would help courts distinguish between quiet title actions and other actions for affirmative relief that were disguised as quiet title actions.108 ¶54 We explained that to determine whether an action was a genuine quiet title action, courts must examine the relief sought.109 If the party “merely requests that the court adjudicate the validity of an opponent’s adverse or hostile claim to property to which the party already holds title,” then the claim is truly a quiet title claim.110 But if a party cannot establish its quiet title claim without fir | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Bangerter v. Petty
green
2 sentences2018In other words, a party asserts a true quiet title claim when "that party merely requests that the court adjudicate the validity of an opponent's adverse or hostile claim to property to which the party [either] already holds title," Hoopiiaina , 2006 UT 53 , ¶ 27, 144 P.3d 1129 , or is in "actual possession ... under a claim of ownership," Bangerter , 2009 UT 67 , ¶ 14, 225 P.3d 874 . 5 ¶14 Claims 1 and 2 cannot be characterized as true quiet title actions, because PPLR does not claim to hold title to the Landfill Area, nor is it in actual possession. 2018In other words, a party asserts a true quiet title claim when "that party merely requests that the court adjudicate the validity of an opponent's adverse or hostile claim to property to which the party [either] already holds title," Hoopiiaina , 2006 UT 53 , ¶ 27, 144 P.3d 1129 , or is in "actual possession ... under a claim of ownership," Bangerter , 2009 UT 67 , ¶ 14, 225 P.3d 874 . 5 ¶14 Claims 1 and 2 cannot be characterized as true quiet title actions, because PPLR does not claim to hold title to the Landfill Area, nor is it in actual possession. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Haynes Land & Livestock Co. v. Jacob Family Chalk Creek, LLC
green
2 sentences2016Quiet Title T82 The Mitchells contend that the district court prematurely dismissed their sixth cause of action for quiet title In so arguing, they concede that the property was subject to the trust deed but assert that the district court "never examined, let alone determined, who, if anybody, actually has any valid, enforceable-claim against the Property based on the trust deed." 133 "A quiet title action 'is a suit brought to quiet an existing title against an adverse or hostile claim of another and the effect of a decree quieting title is not to vest title but rather is to perfect an existi 2016Quiet Title T82 The Mitchells contend that the district court prematurely dismissed their sixth cause of action for quiet title In so arguing, they concede that the property was subject to the trust deed but assert that the district court "never examined, let alone determined, who, if anybody, actually has any valid, enforceable-claim against the Property based on the trust deed." 133 "A quiet title action 'is a suit brought to quiet an existing title against an adverse or hostile claim of another and the effect of a decree quieting title is not to vest title but rather is to perfect an existi | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Florida Asset Financing Corp. v. Utah Labor Commission
neutral
1 sentence2014However, the party's claim for quiet title relief can be granted only if the party succeeds on another claim, then the statute of limitations applicable to the other claim will also apply to the quiet title claim." Id. (alteration in original) (quoting In re Hoopitaina Trust, 2006 UT 58, ¶¶26-27 , 144 P.3d 1129 ). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
In the Matter of Lee
green
1 sentence2014However, the party's claim for quiet title relief can be granted only if the party succeeds on another claim, then the statute of limitations applicable to the other claim will also apply to the quiet title claim." Id. (alteration in original) (quoting In re Hoopitaina Trust, 2006 UT 58, ¶¶26-27 , 144 P.3d 1129 ). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.