Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Feigley v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2018See Feigley, 16 Va. App. at 721 , 432 S.E.2d at 523 (noting that prejudice may be shown if “court-appointed attorney conducted an inadequate investigation, was unprepared for trial, or failed to pursue a vigorous defense”). 2018See Feigley, 16 Va. App. at 721 , 432 S.E.2d at 523 (noting that prejudice may be shown if “court-appointed attorney conducted an inadequate investigation, was unprepared for trial, or failed to pursue a vigorous defense”). | 1 | 5 |
United States v. Michael Randgreen1 sentence2023See United States v. Rand, 835 F.3d 451, 460, 462 (4th Cir. 2016) (holding that the constitutional error of excluding a small portion of the defendant’s testimony about his confession was harmless given “the overwhelming evidence” and his “opportunity to present a vigorous defense” and “explain ‘what was in his mind’ during his various interviews,” “albeit in a slightly limited way”). - 37 - CONCLUSION We hold that the trial court did not commit reversible error in any of the ways that the appellant alleges. | 1 | 1 |
Cardwell v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1997The requisite prejudice must be established by affirmative proof, see Cardwell v. Commonwealth, 248 Va. 501, 509 , 450 S.E.2d 146, 151 (1994), which may include evidence "that the court-appointed attorney conducted an inadequate investigation, was unprepared for trial, or failed to pursue a vigorous defense." Feigley, 16 Va. App. at 721 , 432 S.E.2d at 523 . 1997The requisite prejudice must be established by affirmative proof, see Cardwell v. Commonwealth, 248 Va. 501, 509 , 450 S.E.2d 146, 151 (1994), which may include evidence "that the court-appointed attorney conducted an inadequate investigation, was unprepared for trial, or failed to pursue a vigorous defense." Feigley, 16 Va. App. at 721 , 432 S.E.2d at 523 . | 1 | 1 |
Board of Supervisors of Henrico County v. Martingreen2 sentences1994Because we are guided by the well settled principle that “the Workers’ Compensation Law should be construed liberally in favor of the worker,” Board of Supervisors v. Martin, 3 Va. App. 139, 146 , 348 S.E.2d 540, 543 (1986), we are persuaded by the authorities cited herein and find that the phrase “prejudiced thereby,” as used in Code § 65.2-600(D), does not encompass a statutory employer’s economic loss from the inability to obtain indemnification. 1994Because we are guided by the well settled principle that “the Workers’ Compensation Law should be construed liberally in favor of the worker,” Board of Supervisors v. Martin, 3 Va. App. 139, 146 , 348 S.E.2d 540, 543 (1986), we are persuaded by the authorities cited herein and find that the phrase “prejudiced thereby,” as used in Code § 65.2-600(D), does not encompass a statutory employer’s economic loss from the inability to obtain indemnification. | 1 | 1 |
Hannick v. Kelly Temporary Servicesgreen1 sentence1994Richard Bogese Builder, Inc. v. Robertson, 17 Va. App. 700, 706-07 , 440 S.E.2d 622, 626 (1994) (affirming commission’s finding of no prejudice based on evidence that statutory employer “ ‘presented a vigorous defense’ . . . and the record shows that [claimant] received immediate treatment for his injuries”); Hannick v. Kelly Temporary Servs., 855 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993) (delay did not hinder employer’s ability to minimize injury or investigate case); Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Comm’n, 153 Ariz. 210, 215-16 , 735 P.2d 820, 825-26 (1987) (en banc) (lack of prejudice may be | 1 | 1 |
Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Commissiongreen2 sentences1994Richard Bogese Builder, Inc. v. Robertson, 17 Va. App. 700, 706-07 , 440 S.E.2d 622, 626 (1994) (affirming commission’s finding of no prejudice based on evidence that statutory employer “ ‘presented a vigorous defense’ . . . and the record shows that [claimant] received immediate treatment for his injuries”); Hannick v. Kelly Temporary Servs., 855 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993) (delay did not hinder employer’s ability to minimize injury or investigate case); Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Comm’n, 153 Ariz. 210, 215-16 , 735 P.2d 820, 825-26 (1987) (en banc) (lack of prejudice may be 1994Richard Bogese Builder, Inc. v. Robertson, 17 Va. App. 700, 706-07 , 440 S.E.2d 622, 626 (1994) (affirming commission’s finding of no prejudice based on evidence that statutory employer “ ‘presented a vigorous defense’ . . . and the record shows that [claimant] received immediate treatment for his injuries”); Hannick v. Kelly Temporary Servs., 855 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993) (delay did not hinder employer’s ability to minimize injury or investigate case); Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Comm’n, 153 Ariz. 210, 215-16 , 735 P.2d 820, 825-26 (1987) (en banc) (lack of prejudice may be | 1 | 1 |
C. Richard Bogese Builder, Inc. v. Robertsongreen2 sentences1994Richard Bogese Builder, Inc. v. Robertson, 17 Va. App. 700, 706-07 , 440 S.E.2d 622, 626 (1994) (affirming commission’s finding of no prejudice based on evidence that statutory employer “ ‘presented a vigorous defense’ . . . and the record shows that [claimant] received immediate treatment for his injuries”); Hannick v. Kelly Temporary Servs., 855 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993) (delay did not hinder employer’s ability to minimize injury or investigate case); Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Comm’n, 153 Ariz. 210, 215-16 , 735 P.2d 820, 825-26 (1987) (en banc) (lack of prejudice may be 1994Richard Bogese Builder, Inc. v. Robertson, 17 Va. App. 700, 706-07 , 440 S.E.2d 622, 626 (1994) (affirming commission’s finding of no prejudice based on evidence that statutory employer “ ‘presented a vigorous defense’ . . . and the record shows that [claimant] received immediate treatment for his injuries”); Hannick v. Kelly Temporary Servs., 855 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993) (delay did not hinder employer’s ability to minimize injury or investigate case); Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Comm’n, 153 Ariz. 210, 215-16 , 735 P.2d 820, 825-26 (1987) (en banc) (lack of prejudice may be | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Lisa Jones
green
2 sentences2019Id. (citing Jones, 900 F.2d at 519 ). 1993Jones, 900 F.2d at 519 . | 2 | 1993–2019 |
Arguello v. United States
green
1 sentence2019Id. (citing Jones, 900 F.2d at 519 ). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.