Requiring error (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

Requiring error in Washington

9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2025 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Campos v. Department of Labor & Industriesgreen
washctapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020See Campos v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 75 Wn.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Lazcano green
washctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2025Requiring error preservation through timely objections “serves the goal of judicial economy by enabling trial courts to correct mistakes and thereby obviate the needless expense of appellate review and further trials.” State v. Lazcano, 188 Wn.

2025Requiring error preservation through objections “serves the goal of judicial economy by enabling trial courts to correct 6 Legal financial obligations. 16 No. 39939-7-III State v. Hall mistakes and thereby obviate the needless expense of appellate review and further trials.” State v. Lazcano, 188 Wn.

52025–2025
City of Seattle v. Heatley green
washctapp · 1993
2 sentences

2006City of Seattle v. Heatley, 70 Wash.App. 573, 584-85 , 854 P.2d 658 (1993).

2006City of Seattle v. Heatley, 70 Wn.

22006–2006
In Re the Personal Restraint of Carrier green
wash · 2012
1 sentence

2020Requiring defendants to petition the court twice under RCW 9.95.240 to obtain dismissal and then vacation served “no purpose.” Id.

12020–2020

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.030 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 18 (1972–2023) WA 9 (2006–2025) CA 8 (1997–2019) NY 7 (1994–2024) NJ 6 (1984–2025) NC 5 (1919–2022) VT 4 (1996–2022) TX 4 (1878–2024) CO 4 (1993–2015) UT 3 (1992–2024) PA 3 (2013–2025) ID 3 (2011–2011) IN 3 (1983–2010) TN 3 (1872–1872) HI 2 (1996–2017) DC 2 (2009–2023) LA 2 (1985–1988) MD 2 (1999–2016) MI 2 (1992–1997) AK 2 (1982–2025) AZ 2 (1995–2013) OH 2 (1984–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check