9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Behrensgreen1 sentence2011E.g., Clark, 24 Wn.2d at 111 ; Behrens, 24 Wn.2d at 133 (proceeding to obtain a writ of habeas corpus was not available where the judgment did “not show upon its face, nor when read in connection with any applicable statute, that it [wa]s void”). ¶64 In enacting RCW 10.73.090(1), the legislature understood the scope of the right to collaterally attack a judgment in a criminal case as protected by the suspension clause and as it had developed at common law. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Redmond v. Moore
green
2 sentences2006City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wash.2d 664, 668 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). 2006City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wn.2d 664, 668 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
City of Redmond v. Moore
green
2 sentences2006City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wash.2d 664, 668 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). 2006City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wn.2d 664, 668 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Warner v. Trombetta
green
2 sentences2005The risk of erroneous deprivation of this important property interest is significant. 6 ¶21 In Moore we relied on Warner v. Trombetta, 348 F. Supp. 1068 (M.D. 2005The risk of erroneous deprivation of this important property interest is significant. [2] ¶ 20 In Moore we relied on Warner v. Trombetta, 348 F.Supp. 1068 (M.D.Pa.1972), aff'd, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1392 , 35 L.Ed.2d 583 (1973), and again it is precisely on point. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Felker v. Turpin
green
2 sentences2004Felker, 518 U.S. at 664 . 2004Felker, 518 U.S. at 664 , 116 S.Ct. 2333 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of Runyan
green
2 sentences2011Id. at 444 . 2011With regard to collateral attacks on judgments in criminal proceedings, history gives contextual meaning to what types of judgments and sentences have been considered without any time limits as well as what it means for a judgment and sentence to be “invalid on its face.” ¶53 The first time that RCW 10.73.090(1) came before us for interpretation was in Runyan, 121 Wn.2d 432 , where the principal claim was that the one-year time bar in RCW 10.73.090(1) violated the suspension clause of the Washington State Constitution. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
In Re Clark
green
1 sentence2011E.g., Clark, 24 Wn.2d at 111 ; Behrens, 24 Wn.2d at 133 (proceeding to obtain a writ of habeas corpus was not available where the judgment did “not show upon its face, nor when read in connection with any applicable statute, that it [wa]s void”). ¶64 In enacting RCW 10.73.090(1), the legislature understood the scope of the right to collaterally attack a judgment in a criminal case as protected by the suspension clause and as it had developed at common law. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
In re Lybarger
green
2 sentences2011Runyan, 121 Wn.2d at 441-43 . ¶55 At common law, that “the petitioner was held by any process or judgment good upon its face not only precluded inquiry into the validity of such process or judgment, but also precluded inquiry as to the facts of his being held by such process or judgment at all” In re Habeas Corpus of Lybarger, 2 Wash. 131, 134 , 25 P. 1075 (1891) (emphasis added). 2011Runyan, 121 Wn.2d at 441-43 . ¶55 At common law, that “the petitioner was held by any process or judgment good upon its face not only precluded inquiry into the validity of such process or judgment, but also precluded inquiry as to the facts of his being held by such process or judgment at all” In re Habeas Corpus of Lybarger, 2 Wash. 131, 134 , 25 P. 1075 (1891) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Barr v. Thorp Credit, Inc.
green
1 sentence2005The risk of erroneous deprivation of this important property interest is significant. [2] ¶ 20 In Moore we relied on Warner v. Trombetta, 348 F.Supp. 1068 (M.D.Pa.1972), aff'd, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1392 , 35 L.Ed.2d 583 (1973), and again it is precisely on point. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
In re Disbarment of Thaler
green
1 sentence2005The risk of erroneous deprivation of this important property interest is significant. [2] ¶ 20 In Moore we relied on Warner v. Trombetta, 348 F.Supp. 1068 (M.D.Pa.1972), aff'd, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1392 , 35 L.Ed.2d 583 (1973), and again it is precisely on point. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Allen v. Foster
green
1 sentence2005The risk of erroneous deprivation of this important property interest is significant. [2] ¶ 20 In Moore we relied on Warner v. Trombetta, 348 F.Supp. 1068 (M.D.Pa.1972), aff'd, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1392 , 35 L.Ed.2d 583 (1973), and again it is precisely on point. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Harmon v. McNutt
green
2 sentences2000The equal protection clauses of both the state and federal constitutions require that "persons similarly situated with respect to the legitimate purpose of the law receive like treatment." Harmon v. McNutt, 91 Wn.2d 126, 130 , 587 P.2d 537 (1978). 2000The equal protection clauses of both the state and federal constitutions require that "persons similarly situated with respect to the legitimate purpose of the law receive like treatment." Harmon v. McNutt, 91 Wn.2d 126, 130 , 587 P.2d 537 (1978). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Toliver v. Olsen
green
2 sentences2000Toliver v. Olsen, 109 Wn.2d 607, 609 , 746 P.2d 809 (1987). 2000Toliver v. Olsen, 109 Wn.2d 607, 609 , 746 P.2d 809 (1987). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Voigt v. Mahoney
green
2 sentences2000Voigt v. Mahoney, 10 Wn.2d 157, 162-63 , 116 P.2d 300 (1941). 2000Voigt v. Mahoney, 10 Wn.2d 157, 162-63 , 116 P.2d 300 (1941). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Womack
green
2 sentences1975See RCW 46.20.308 (4); State v. Womack, 82 Wn.2d 382, 386 , 510 P.2d 1133 (1973). 1975See RCW 46.20.308 (4); State v. Womack, 82 Wn.2d 382, 386 , 510 P.2d 1133 (1973). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.